Infer `Lld::No` linker hint when the linker stem is a generic compiler driver
This PR basically reverts the temporary solution in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113631 to a more long-term solution.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
In [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113631#issuecomment-1634598238), you had ideas about a long-term solution:
> I wonder what a good non-temporary solution for the inference would look like.
>
> * If the default is `(Cc::No, Lld::Yes)` (e.g. `rust-lld`)
>
> * and we switch to some specific platform compiler (e.g. `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`), should we change to `Lld::No`? Maybe yes?
> * and we switch to some non-default but generic compiler `-C linker=clang`? Then maybe not?
>
> * If the default is `(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` (e.g. future x86_64 linux with default LLD)
>
> * and we switch to some specific platform compiler (e.g. `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`), should we change to `Lld::No`? Maybe yes?
> * and we switch to some non-default but generic compiler `-C linker=clang`? Then maybe not?
>
I believe that we should infer the `Lld::No` linker hint for any `-Clinker` override, and all the cases above:
- the linker drivers have their own defaults, so in my mind `-Clinker` is a signal to use its default linker / flavor, rather than ours or the target's. In the case of generic compilers, it's more likely than not going to be `Lld::No`. I would expect this to be the case in general, even when including platform-specific compilers.
- the guess will be wrong if the linker driver uses lld by default (and we also don't want to search for `-fuse-ld` link args), but will work in the more common cases. And the minority of other cases can fix the wrong guess by opting into the precise linker flavor.
- this also ensures backwards-compatibility: today, even on targets with an lld default and overriding the linker, rustc will not use lld. That includes `thumbv6m-none-eabi` where issue #113597 happened.
It looks like the simplest option, and the one with least churn: we maintain the current behavior in ambiguous cases.
I've tested that this works on #113597, as expected from the failure.
(I also have a no-std `run-make` test using a custom target json spec: basically simulating a future `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` using an lld flavor by default, to check that e.g. `-Clinker=clang` doesn't use lld. I could add that test to this PR, but IIUC such a custom target requires `cargo -Z build-std` and we have no tests depending on this cargo feature yet. Let me know if you want to add this test of the linker inference for such targets.)
What do you think ?
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just its two symbols
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just the two symbols of each proc-macro crate.
The main known effect of doing this is to stop including `#[no_mangle]` symbols in the linker version script.
Background:
The combination of a proc-macro crate with an import of another crate that itself exports a no_mangle function was broken for a period of time, because:
* In PR #99944 we stopped exporting no_mangle symbols from proc-macro crates; proc-macro crates have a very limited interface and are meant to be treated as a blackbox to everything except rustc itself. However: he constructed linker version script still referred to them, but resolving that discrepancy was left as a FIXME in the code, tagged with issue #99978.
* In PR #108017 we started telling the linker to check (via the`--no-undefined-version` linker invocation flag) that every symbol referenced in the "linker version script" is provided as linker input. So the unresolved discrepancy from #99978 started surfacing as a compile-time error (e.g. #111888).
Fix#111888Fix#99978.
Remove arm crypto target feature
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1407.
LLVM has moved away from a combined `crypto` feature on both aarch64 and arm, and we did the same on aarch64, but were deferred from doing the same on arm due to compatibility with older LLVM.
As the minimum LLVM version has increased, we can now remove this (unstable) target feature on arm.
r? `@Amanieu`
Avoid exporting __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic more than once.
Exporting `__rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic` multiple times causes `ld.gold` to balk with: `error: version script assignment of to symbol __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic failed: symbol not defined`
Specifically this breaks builds of 1.70.0 and newer on DragonFly and YoctoProject with `ld.gold`. Builds with `ld.bfd` and `lld` should be unaffected.
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/708194/
Add documentation to has_deref
Documentation of `has_deref` needed some polish to be more clear about where it should be used and what's it's purpose.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114401
r? `@RalfJung`
Add separate feature gate for async fn track caller
This patch adds a feature gate `async_fn_track_caller` that is separate from `closure_track_caller`. This is to allow enabling `async_fn_track_caller` separately.
Fixes#110009
Enable tests on rustc_codegen_ssa
This enables unittests in rustc_codegen_ssa. There are some tests, primarily in [`back/rpath/tests.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/HEAD/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/rpath/tests.rs) that haven't ever been running since the unittests are disabled. From what I can tell, this was just a consequence of how things evolved. When testing was initially added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33282, `librustc_trans` had test=false because it didn't have any tests. `rustc_codegen_ssa` eventually split off from that (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55627), and the rpath module eventually got merged in too (from `librustc_back` where it used to live). That migration didn't enable the tests.
This also includes some fluent diagnostic tests, though I'm not sure what exactly they are testing.
This patch adds a feature gate `async_fn_track_caller` that is separate from `closure_track_caller`. This is to allow enabling `async_fn_track_caller` separately.
Fixes#110009
Exporting `__rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic` multiple times
causes ld.gold to balk with: `error: version script assignment of to
symbol __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic failed: symbol not
defined`
Specifically this breaks builds on DragonFly and YoctoProject with
ld.gold. Builds with ld.bfd should be unaffected.
cleanup: remove pointee types
This can't be merged until the oldest LLVM version we support uses opaque pointers, which will be the case after #114148. (Also note `-Cllvm-args="-opaque-pointers=0"` can technically be used in LLVM 15, though I don't think we should support that configuration.)
I initially hoped this would provide some minor perf win, but in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105412#issuecomment-1341224450 it had very little impact, so this is only valuable as a cleanup.
As a followup, this will enable #96242 to be resolved.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label S-blocked
This function has some shared code for the thin LTO and fat LTO cases,
but those cases have so little in common that it's actually clearer to
treat them fully separately.
PR #112946 tweaked the naming of LLVM threads, but messed things up
slightly, resulting in threads on Windows having names like `optimize
module {} regex.f10ba03eb5ec7975-cgu.0`.
This commit removes the extraneous `{} `.
The main loop has a *very* complex condition, which includes two
mentions of `codegen_state`. The body of the loop then immediately
switches on the `codegen_state`.
I find it easier to understand if it's a `loop` and we check for exit
conditions after switching on `codegen_state`. We end up with a tiny bit
of code duplication, but it's clear that (a) we never exit in the
`Ongoing` case, (b) we exit in the `Completed` state only if several
things are true (and there's interaction with LTO there), and (c) we
exit in the `Aborted` state if a couple of things are true. Also, the
exit conditions are all simple conjunctions.
This loop condition involves `codegen_state`, `work_items`, and
`running_with_own_token`. But the body of the loop cannot modify
`codegen_state`, so repeatedly checking it is unnecessary.
`CodegenContext` is immutable except for the `worker` field - we clone
`CodegenContext` in multiple places, changing the `worker` field each
time. It's simpler to move the `worker` field out of `CodegenContext`.
It took me some time to understand how the main thread can lend a
jobserver token to an LLVM thread. This commit renames a couple of
things to make it clearer.
- Rename the `LLVMing` variant as `Lending`, because that is a clearer
description of what is happening.
- Rename `running` as `running_with_own_token`, which makes it clearer
that there might be one additional LLVM thread running (with a loaned
token). Also add a comment to its definition.
And rename the `Compiled` variant as `Finished`, because that name makes
it clearer there is nothing left to do, contrasting nicely with the
`Needs*` variants.
