The extra filename and line was mainly there to keep the indentation
relative to the main snippet; now that this doesn't include
filename/line-number as a prefix, it is distracted.
There's a lot of stuff wrong with the representation of these types:
TyFnDef doesn't actually uniquely identify a function, TyFnPtr is used to
represent method calls, TyFnDef in the sub-expression of a cast isn't
correctly reified, and probably some other stuff I haven't discovered yet.
Splitting them seems like the right first step, though.
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777#30877rust-lang/rust#1192rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
A whole bunch of stuff gets folded into struct handling! Plus, removes
an ugly hack from trans and accidentally fixes a bug with constructing
ranges from references (see later commits with tests).
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31487#issuecomment-182945101
plugin-[breaking-change]
The first commit renames `ast::Pat_` to `ast::PatKind` and uses its variants in enum qualified form. I've also taken the opportunity and renamed `PatKind::Region` into `PatKind::Ref`.
The second commit splits `PatKind::Enum` into `PatKind::TupleStruct` and `PatKind::UnitStruct`.
So, pattern kinds now correspond to their struct/variant kinds - `Struct`, `TupleStruct` and `UnitStruct`.
@nikomatsakis @nrc @arielb1 Are you okay with this naming scheme?
An alternative possible naming scheme is `PatKind::StructVariant`, `PatKind::TupleVariant`, `PatKind::UnitVariant` (it's probably closer to the common use, but I like it less).
I intend to apply these changes to HIR later, they should not necessarily go in the same nightly with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31487
r? @Manishearth
<sup>**context:** moving back to a layered approach to type checking.</sup>
It looks like they'd not ended up tightly coupled in the time one was owned by the other. Every instance outside of `FnCtxt.inh` was from an `InferCtxt` created and dropped in the same function body.
This conflicts slightly with #30652, but there too it looks like the `FulfillmentContext` is from an `InferCtxt` that is created and dropped within the same function body (across one call to a module-private function).
That said, I heard that the PR that originally moved `FulfillmentContext` into `InferCtxt` was big, which leaves me concerned that I'm missing something.
r? @nikomatsakis
r? @brson
cc @alexcrichton
I still need to add error code explanation test with this, but I can't figure out a way to generate the `.md` files in order to test example source codes.
Will fix#27328.
This commit removes the `-D warnings` flag being passed through the makefiles to
all crates to instead be a crate attribute. We want these attributes always
applied for all our standard builds, and this is more amenable to Cargo-based
builds as well.
Note that all `deny(warnings)` attributes are gated with a `cfg(stage0)`
attribute currently to match the same semantics we have today
This PR adds some minor error correction to the parser - if there is a missing ident, we recover and carry on. It also makes compilation more robust so that non-fatal errors (which is still most of them, unfortunately) in parsing do not cause us to abort compilation. The effect is that a program with a missing or incorrect ident can get all the way to type checking.
This commit removes the `-D warnings` flag being passed through the makefiles to
all crates to instead be a crate attribute. We want these attributes always
applied for all our standard builds, and this is more amenable to Cargo-based
builds as well.
Note that all `deny(warnings)` attributes are gated with a `cfg(stage0)`
attribute currently to match the same semantics we have today
