- Methodyfied the string ascii extionsion functions - They got added recently, I wrapped them in a trait.
- Added `into_owned()` method for vectors - similar to `Str`'s `into_owned()` function, allows to convert to a owned vector without making a copy if the source is a owned vector.
- Added `or_some` method to option - similar to `unwrap_or_default`, but keeps the values wrapped in an `Option`. Useful for `Option` chains, eg Iterator impls.
- Added `DoubleEndedIterator` impl to `Option` - Just for compatibility with generic Iterator functions.
- Renamed nil.rs to unit.rs - the type got renamed ages ago, it's time the source file is as well.
If they are on the trait then it is extremely annoying to use them as
generic parameters to a function, e.g. with the iterator param on the trait
itself, if one was to pass an Extendable<int> to a function that filled it
either from a Range or a Map<VecIterator>, one needs to write something
like:
fn foo<E: Extendable<int, Range<int>> +
Extendable<int, Map<&'self int, int, VecIterator<int>>>
(e: &mut E, ...) { ... }
since using a generic, i.e. `foo<E: Extendable<int, I>, I: Iterator<int>>`
means that `foo` takes 2 type parameters, and the caller has to specify them
(which doesn't work anyway, as they'll mismatch with the iterators used in
`foo` itself).
This patch changes it to:
fn foo<E: Extendable<int>>(e: &mut E, ...) { ... }
The type of the result of option_env! was not fully specified in the
None case, leading to type check failures in the case where the variable
was not defined (e.g. option_env!("FOO").is_none()).
Also cleaned up some compilation warnings.
While looking over the code for object coercion, I realized that it wasn't quite handling freezing and reborrowing correctly. Tweak the code, adding tests for the relevant cases.
r? @pcwalton
This includes a number of improvements to `ifmt!`
* Implements formatting arguments -- `{:0.5x}` works now
* Formatting now works on all integer widths, not just `int` and `uint`
* Added a large doc block to `std::fmt` which should help explain what `ifmt!` is all about
* Added floating point formatters, although they have the same pitfalls from before (they're just proof-of-concept now)
Closed a couple of issues along the way, yay! Once this gets into a snapshot, I'll start looking into removing all of `fmt`
This pull request re-implements handling of visibility scopes and source code positions in debug info. It should now be very stable and properly handle
+ variable shadowing
+ expanded code (macros and the new for-loop de-sugaring, for example)
+ variables in the middle of nested scopes
+ bindings declared in the head of match statement arms.
all of which did not work at all or did not work reliably before. Those interested in a more detailed description of the problems at hand, I kindly refer to http://michaelwoerister.github.io/2013/08/03/visibility-scopes.html
Why doesn't the `populate_scope_map()` function use `syntax::visit`?
Because it would not improve this particular AST walker (see: 69dc790849 (commitcomment-3781426))
Cheers,
Michael
Since the new runtime landed, the *-nopt builders have increased cycle time by roughly an hour. I have a feeling that this is because the entire runtime is in rust and it's not being optimized at all. In that past with an optimized C++ runtime it looks like things ran faster.
This adds the ability to disable optimizations in tests only, not for the entire compiler. This means that the entire compiler and associated libraries will be built with optimizations, but the tests themselves would be built and run without optimizations.
This isn't quite as good of a guarantee as disabling optimizations everywhere, but hopefully it'll improve cycle time for the *-nopt builds to move the queue along faster.
It now actually does logging, and is compiled out when `--cfg rtdebug` is not
given to the libstd build, which it isn't by default. This makes the rt
benchmarks 18-50% faster.
Use Eq + Ord for lexicographical ordering of sequences.
For each of <, <=, >= or > as R, use::
[x, ..xs] R [y, ..ys] = if x != y { x R y } else { xs R ys }
Previous code using `a < b` and then `!(b < a)` for short-circuiting
fails on cases such as [1.0, 2.0] < [0.0/0.0, 3.0], where the first
element was effectively considered equal.
Containers like &[T] did also implement only one comparison operator `<`,
and derived the comparison results from this. This isn't correct either for
Ord.
Implement functions in `std::iterator::order::{lt,le,gt,ge,equal,cmp}` that all
iterable containers can use for lexical order.
We also visit tuple ordering, having the same problem and same solution
(but differing implementation).
