Update doc comments that refer to config parameter
This commit updates the `source_file_to_parser` and the
`maybe_source_file_to_parse` function's doc comments which currently
refer to a `config` parameter. The doc comments have been updated to
refer to the `session` parameter similar to the doc comment for
`try_file_to_source_file`, which also takes a `&Session` parameter.
remove some provenance-related machine hooks that Miri no longer needs
Then we can make `scalar_to_ptr` a method on `Scalar`. :)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2188
r? `@oli-obk`
This commit updates the source_file_to_parser and the
maybe_source_file_to_parse function's doc comments which currently
refer to a config parameter. The doc comments have been updated to
refer to the 'session' parameter similar to the doc comment for
try_file_to_source_file, which also takes a &Session parameter.
Upgrade indexmap and thorin-dwp to use hashbrown 0.12
This removes the last dependencies on hashbrown 0.11.
This also upgrades to hashbrown 0.12.3 to fix a double-free (#99372).
Add fine-grained LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR improves the LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support in the Rust compiler by providing forward-edge control flow protection for Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups identified by their return and parameter types.
Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as part of this project by identifying C char and integer type uses at the time types are encoded (see Type metadata in the design document in the tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89653).
LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and requires LTO (i.e., -Clto).
Thank you again, `@eddyb,` `@nagisa,` `@pcc,` and `@tmiasko` for all the help!
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99298 (Make `ui-fulldeps/gated-plugins` and `ui-fulldeps/multiple-plugins` tests stage 2 only)
- #99396 (Add some additional double-adjustment regression tests)
- #99449 (Do not resolve associated const when there is no provided value)
- #99595 (Mark atomics as unsupported on thumbv6m)
- #99627 (Lock stdout once when listing tests)
- #99638 (Remove Clean trait implementation for hir::Ty and middle::Ty)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Mark atomics as unsupported on thumbv6m
The thumbv6m target does not support atomics. Historically, LLVM
had a bug where atomic load/stores for this target were emitted
as plain load/stores rather than as libatomic calls. This was
fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D120026, which will be part of
LLVM 15. As we require that "atomic support" does not use libatomic,
we need to indicate that this target does not have native atomics.
Do not resolve associated const when there is no provided value
Fixes#98629, since now we just delay a bug when we're not able to evaluate a const item due to the value not actually being provided by anything. This means compilation proceeds forward to where the "missing item in impl" error is emitted.
----
The root issue here is that when we're looking for the defining `LeafDef` in `resolve_associated_item`, we end up getting the trait's AssocItem instead of the impl's AssocItem (which does not exist). This resolution "succeeds" even if the trait's item has no default value, and then since this item has no value to evaluate, it turns into a const eval error.
This root issue becomes problematic (as in #98629) when this const eval error happens in wfcheck (for example, due to normalizing the param-env of something that references this const). Since this happens sooner than the check that an impl actually provides all of the items that a trait requires (which happens during later typecheck), we end up aborting compilation early with only this un-informative message.
I'm not exactly sure _why_ this bug arises due to #96591 -- perhaps valtrees are evaluated more eagerly than in the old system?
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr`` since y'all are familiar with const eval and reviewed #96591, though feel free to reassign.
This is a regression from stable to beta, so I would be open to considering this for beta backport. It seems correct to me, especially given the improvements in the other UI tests this PR touches, but may have some side-effects that I'm unaware of...?
Add support for LLVM ShadowCallStack.
LLVMs ShadowCallStack provides backward edge control flow integrity protection by using a separate shadow stack to store and retrieve a function's return address.
LLVM currently only supports this for AArch64 targets. The x18 register is used to hold the pointer to the shadow stack, and therefore this only works on ABIs which reserve x18. Further details are available in the [LLVM ShadowCallStack](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ShadowCallStack.html) docs.
# Usage
`-Zsanitizer=shadow-call-stack`
# Comments/Caveats
* Currently only enabled for the aarch64-linux-android target
* Requires the platform to define a runtime to initialize the shadow stack, see the [LLVM docs](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ShadowCallStack.html) for more detail.
This commit improves the LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support in
the Rust compiler by providing forward-edge control flow protection for
Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups
identified by their return and parameter types.
Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled
code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code
share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as
part of this project by identifying C char and integer type uses at the
time types are encoded (see Type metadata in the design document in the
tracking issue #89653).
LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and requires LTO (i.e.,
-Clto).
Use span_bug in case of unexpected rib kind
Extremely minor QOL change to improve the ICE compiler output in case
this default match case is encountered (an unexpected rib kind).
I have limited experience in this area of the compiler; please let me know
if a span more precise than `param.ident.span` is more applicable.
