Producing a good suggestion for this lint is already hard when no macros
are involved. With macros the lint message and the suggestion are just
confusing. Since both, producing a good suggestion and figuring out if
this pattern can be re-written inside a macro is nearly impossible, just
bail out.
[single_char_pattern] add strip_prefix and strip_suffix
Title says it all. Adjusted ui tests.
I added the second commit in case you don't like that I moved that table into `single_char_pattern.rs` directly. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be in that file. It isn't used anywhere else.
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: add strip_prefix and strip_suffix to single_char_pattern lint
while_immutable_cond: check condition for mutation
This fixes#6689 by also checking the bindings mutated in the condition, whereas it was previously only checked in the loop body.
---
changelog: Fix FP in [`while_immutable_cond`] where mutation in the loop variable wasn't picked up.
`implicit_return` improvements
fixes: #6940
changelog: Fix `implicit_return` suggestion for async functions
changelog: Improve `implicit_return` suggestions when returning the result of a macro
changelog: Check for `break` expressions inside a loop which are then implicitly returned
changelog: Allow all diverging functions in `implicit_return`, not just panic functions
Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
fixes#6808
changelog: Fix FN in `iter_cloned_collect` with a large array
I spotted that [is_iterable_array](a362a4d1d0/clippy_lints/src/loops/explicit_iter_loop.rs (L67-L75)) function that `explicit_iter_loop` lint is using only works for array sizes <= 32.
There is this comment:
> IntoIterator is currently only implemented for array sizes <= 32 in rustc
I'm a bit confused, because I read that [IntoIterator for arrays](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/core/array/mod.rs.html#194-201) with const generic `N` is stable since = "1.0.0". Although Const Generics MVP were stabilized in Rust 1.51.
Should I set MSRV for the current change? I will try to test with older compilers soon.
manual_unwrap_or: fix invalid code suggestion, due to macro expansion
fixes#6965
changelog: fix invalid code suggestion in `manual_unwrap_or` lint, due to macro expansion
`single_component_path_imports`: ignore `pub(crate) use some_macro;`
Fixes#7106
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Ignore exporting a macro within a crate using `pub(crate) use some_macro;` for [`single_component_path_imports`]
Unused io amount detects `.read().ok()?`
fixes#7096
changelog: unused_io_amount now detect expertion like `.read().ok()?`, `.read().or_else(|err| ...)?` and similar expressions.
Better suggestions when returning macro calls.
Suggest changeing all the break expressions in a loop, not just the final statement.
Don't lint divergent functions.
Don't suggest returning the result of any divergent fuction.
Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
useless use of format! should return function directly
fixes#7066
changelog: [`useless_format`] wraps the content in the braces when it's needed.
r? `@giraffate`
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`
I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations.
The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`.
**Implementation**:
The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`:
```rust
/// This operation is unsupported on this platform.
Unsupported
```
`std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations.
`decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`:
- Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS`
- Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`
- WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS`
**Stability**:
This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention:
> Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value.
The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change.
The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
fixes: #3864
Indentation checks could be added as well, but the lint already doesn't check for it.
changelog: Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
Fixing FPs for the `branches_sharing_code` lint
Fixes#7053Fixes#7054
And an additional CSS adjustment to support dark mode for every inline code. It currently only works in paragraphs, which was an oversight on my part 😅. [Current Example](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#blacklisted_name)
This also includes ~50 lines of doc comments and is therefor not as big as the changes would indicate. 🐧
---
changelog: none
All of these bugs were introduced in this dev version and are therefor not worth a change log entry.
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@camsteffen` since you have a pretty good overview of the `SpanlessEq` implementation 🙃
