internal: Use ItemTree for variant, field and module attribute collection in attrs_query
Less parsing = very good, should speed up lang item collection as that basically probes attributes of all enum variants which currently triggers parsing
Not fond of how this is searching for the correct index, ideally we'd map between HIR and item tree Id here but I am not sure how, storing the item tree ids in the HIR version doesn't work due to the usage of `Trace`...
Otherwise, fall back to the multi ABI scheme, except in testing, where
it becomes a hard error.
This should make it possible to use a rustup-provided rust-analyzer with
proc macro dylibs compiled by older rustcs, and it'll also catch changes
to the format of `rustc --version` or the `.rustc` section that would
make them impossible to compare for equality.
Add PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN environment variable
This allows overriding the toolchain used to run `proc-macro-srv` tests.
---
Sample usage.
Testing the current ABI (variable unset/empty):
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain*
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing an older ABI:
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain*
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="1.58" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing current nightly ABI:
```shell
❯ rustc +nightly --version
rustc 1.64.0-nightly (f8588549c 2022-07-18)
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="nightly" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing future ABI (`rust-lang/rust` master):
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="stage1" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
..........thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'range end index 216221164920373249 out of range for slice of length 18', library/core/src/slice/index.rs:73:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
....F.
failures:
---- tests::test_fn_like_macro2 stdout ----
thread 'tests::test_fn_like_macro2' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "range end index 216221164920373249 out of range for slice of length 18"', crates/proc-macro-srv/src/tests/utils.rs:38:83
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
tests::test_fn_like_macro2
test result: FAILED. 15 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--lib
```
---
Tagging `@jonas-schievink:` this might be helpful when updating versioned ABIs later on.
Add proc-macro-srv integration test that clones literals
This exercises some of the upcoming proc_macro bridge changes. It should also pass for all supported ABIs, with the older-style bridge.
This changed is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Build proc-macro-test-impl out-of-tree
Building it in-place fails in rust CI because the source directory is read-only. This changes `proc-macro-test`'s build script to first
copy `imp` under `OUT_DIR` (which is read-write).
It also prints stdout/stderr for the nested cargo invocation, should it fail. (I've seen failures in rust CI that I couldn't explain, and
when they take 25 minutes to reproduce, you want to have that info)
This change is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Maintainer impact: none.
Building it in-place fails in rust CI because the source directory
is read-only. This changes `proc-macro-test`'s build script to first
copy `imp` under `OUT_DIR` (which is read-write).
It also prints stdout/stderr for the nested cargo invocation, should
it fail. (I've seen failures in rust CI that I couldn't explain, and
when they take 25 minutes to reproduce, you want to have that info)
Remove `check_merge_commits` test
Due to the way "git subtree" works, the `check_merge_commits` test _will_ find merge commits and fail, so we simply skip it.
This changed is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Maintainer impact: none
Rationale: Merge commits will probably end up in
`rust-lang/rust-analyzer` when doing "rust=>ra" syncs anyway.
It could be changed to only check for merge commits in non-sync PRs,
but it's "probably not worth the hassle"
Rename proc macro server from 'Rustc' to 'RustAnalyzer'
Related to:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
This is mostly a courtesy PR for the sake of rustc maintainers. When they looked at `proc-macro-srv`, they noticed the server was named `Rustc` — probably because of historical copy-paste. Only rustc's proc macro server should be named `Rustc`, ra's can be named `RustAnalyzer`.
Maintainer impact: There's no semantic changes in this PR, only naming. One test snapshot was updated since "proc macro server types" were used to test traits somewhere else and I renamed those too, why not.
This adds an `in-rust-tree` feature that will be enabled when
rust-analyzer is built from `rust-lang/rust`. Due to the way
"git subtree" works, that test _will_ find merge commits and
fail, so we simply skip it.
Enable (and fix) extra lint groups required for in-tree build
This enables 3 lint groups that are required to build rust-analyzer as an "in-tree" (git subtree) tool in `rust-lang/rust`, and fixes all relevant diagnostics.
This change is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Maintainer impact: more warnings, should be easy enough to fix them (it's mostly looking out for "rust-2015-isms", the lint group is poorly named). If you forget some, they'll show up during a `ra=>rust` sync.
