`wrapping_div`, `wrapping_rem`, `wrapping_neg`,
`wrapping_shl`, `wrapping_shr`.
All marked unstable under `core` feature for now (with expectation of
being marked as stable by 1.0 release).
As pointed out in [RFC issue 1043][rfc] it is quite useful to have the standard
I/O types to provide the contract that they are the sole owner of the underlying
object they represent. This guarantee enables writing safe interfaces like the
`MemoryMap` API sketched out in that issue.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1043
As constructing objects from these raw handles may end up violating these
ownership gurantees, the functions for construction are now marked unsafe.
[breaking-change]
Closesrust-lang/rfcs#1043
Feel silly because it's just one thing but it was bothering me that the documentation tells you what you're not going to learn now instead of linking to the item in question. Am total noob pls assist, where is power button. :)
`thread::spawn` was previously restricted to closures that return `()`,
which limited the utility of joining on a spawned thread. However, there
is no reason for this restriction, and this commit allows arbitrary
return types.
Since it introduces a type parameter to `JoinHandle`, it's technically
a:
[breaking-change]
However, no code is actually expected to break.
- Adds two more functions for broadcast address and special
address classes reserved for documentation
- Modifies the globally routable IP check to include these
new functions
Fixes#24314
Issue #24292 demonstrates that the `scoped` API as currently offered can
be memory-unsafe: the `JoinGuard` can be moved into a context that will
fail to execute destructors prior to the stack frame being popped (for
example, by creating an `Rc` cycle).
This commit reverts the APIs to `unstable` status while a long-term
solution is worked out.
(There are several possible ways to address this issue; it's not a
fundamental problem with the `scoped` idea, but rather an indication
that Rust doesn't currently provide a good way to ensure that
destructors are run within a particular stack frame.)
[breaking-change]
"Dynamically typed" didn't seem like a relevant distinction; there are statically-compiled dynamically-typed languages. Another term that might work here (despite being notoriously vague) is "scripting languages".
The current implementation of using GetFinalPathNameByHandle actually reads all
intermediate links instead of just looking at the current link. This commit
alters the behavior of the function to use a different API which correctly reads
only one level of the soft link.
[breaking-change]
This PR makes `rustc` emit field names for tuple fields in DWARF. Formerly there was no way of directly accessing the fields of a tuple in GDB and LLDB since there is no C/C++ equivalent to this. Now, the debugger sees the name `__{field-index}` for tuple fields. So you can type for example `some_tuple_val.__2` to get the third tuple component.
When pretty printers are used (e.g. via `rust-gdb` or `rust-lldb`) these artificial field names will not clutter tuple rendering (which was the main motivation for not doing this in the past).
Solves #21948.
