Commit Graph

3391 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fee1-dead
c69edba515 Rollup merge of #102197 - Nilstrieb:const-new-🌲, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`

The FCP was completed in #71835.

Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same `const_btree_new` feature.
2022-09-26 13:09:42 +08:00
Nilstrieb
334f4535bd Stabilize const BTree{Map,Set}::new
Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also
creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same
`const_btree_new` feature.
2022-09-23 20:55:37 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
781e45c224 Bless clippy. 2022-09-23 18:42:14 +02:00
David Koloski
4d015293d1 Merge commit '7248d06384c6a90de58c04c1f46be88821278d8b' into sync-from-clippy 2022-09-21 13:13:27 -04:00
est31
2be8b73328 Fix clippy 2022-09-15 21:21:18 +02:00
Philipp Krones
98bf99e2f8 Merge commit 'b52fb5234cd7c11ecfae51897a6f7fa52e8777fc' into clippyup 2022-09-09 13:36:26 +02:00
bors
ce339b219a Auto merge of #101241 - camsteffen:refactor-binding-annotations, r=cjgillot
`BindingAnnotation` refactor

* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`

One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.

I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
2022-09-06 03:16:29 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda
4bcaddeeb2 separate the receiver from arguments in HIR under /clippy 2022-09-05 22:25:57 +09:00
Cameron Steffen
e5f30f4dfa clippy: BindingAnnotation change 2022-09-02 13:03:11 -05:00
bors
5b784f8ed2 Auto merge of #101249 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-wahnoz8, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100787 (Pretty printing give proper error message without panic)
 - #100838 (Suggest moving redundant generic args of an assoc fn to its trait)
 - #100844 (migrate rustc_query_system to use SessionDiagnostic)
 - #101140 (Update Clippy)
 - #101161 (Fix uintended diagnostic caused by `drain(..)`)
 - #101165 (Use more `into_iter` rather than `drain(..)`)
 - #101229 (Link “? operator” to relevant chapter in The Book)
 - #101230 (lint: avoid linting diag functions with diag lints)
 - #101236 (Avoid needless buffer zeroing in `std::sys::windows::fs`)
 - #101240 (Fix a typo on `wasm64-unknown-unknown` doc)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-31 21:45:18 +00:00
Jason Newcomb
fb41bfa774 Merge commit 'f51aade56f93175dde89177a92e3669ebd8e7592' into clippyup 2022-08-31 09:24:45 -04:00
Ralf Jung
7298de2568 fix a clippy test 2022-08-31 15:24:40 +02:00
bors
7ba06ec9c5 Auto merge of #98919 - 5225225:stricter-invalid-value, r=RalfJung
Strengthen invalid_value lint to forbid uninit primitives, adjust docs to say that's UB

For context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66151#issuecomment-1174477404=

This does not make it a FCW, but it does explicitly state in the docs that uninit integers are UB.

This also doesn't affect any runtime behavior, uninit u32's will still successfully be created through mem::uninitialized.
2022-08-30 20:39:01 +00:00
5225225
98fe5f7c7d Fix tests due to stricter invalid_value 2022-08-29 21:28:35 +01:00
Nilstrieb
ce847beb47 Revert let_chains stabilization
This reverts commit 3266460749.

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29 19:34:11 +02:00
Joshua Nelson
345c42a2d6 Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Philipp Krones
dc29cfb8d5 Merge commit '2b2190cb5667cdd276a24ef8b9f3692209c54a89' into clippyup 2022-08-11 19:42:16 +02:00
Fabian Wolff
f232402057 Warn about dead tuple struct fields 2022-08-03 12:17:23 +02:00
Philipp Krones
67c405cc1d Merge commit '3c7e7dbc1583a0b06df5bd7623dd354a4debd23d' into clippyup 2022-07-28 19:08:22 +02:00
Michael Goulet
632f9945d6 Do not resolve associated const when there is no provided value 2022-07-22 18:58:07 +00:00
Michael Goulet
30a9533570 Mention first and last macro in backtrace 2022-07-19 03:07:54 +00:00
Philipp Krones
7d4daaa8fa Merge commit 'fdb84cbfd25908df5683f8f62388f663d9260e39' into clippyup 2022-07-18 09:39:37 +02:00
Caio
f88a1399bb Stabilize let_chains 2022-07-16 20:17:58 -03:00
Ralf Jung
eee0bf459d add array tests, cleanup, tidy, and bless 2022-07-13 18:31:29 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
1e033a9818 Rollup merge of #99026 - anall:buffix/clippy-9131, r=xFrednet
Add test for and fix rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131

This lint seems to have been broken by #98446 -- but of course, there was no clippy test for this case at the time.

`expr.span.ctxt().outer_expn_data()` now has `MacroKind::Derive` instead of `MacroKind::Attr` for something like:

```
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct UnderscoreInStruct {
    _foo: u32,
}
```

---

changelog: none

closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9131
2022-07-08 08:00:41 +02:00
bors
bee9da14cd Auto merge of #98482 - cjgillot:short-struct-span-closure, r=estebank
Shorten def_span of closures to just their header

Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93967.
2022-07-08 03:05:15 +00:00
Andrea Nall
3388787615 Add test for and fix rust-lang/rust-clippy#9131
This lint seems to have been broken by #98446
2022-07-07 19:30:37 +00:00
Dylan DPC
4f9933afbd Rollup merge of #98507 - xFrednet:rfc-2383-manual-expectation-magic, r=wesleywiser
Finishing touches for `#[expect]` (RFC 2383)

This PR adds documentation and some functionality to rustc's lint passes, to manually fulfill expectations. This is needed for some lints in Clippy. Hopefully, it should be one of the last things before we can move forward with stabilizing this feature.

As part of this PR, I've also updated `clippy::duplicate_mod` to showcase how this new functionality can be used and to ensure that it works correctly.

---

changelog: [`duplicate_mod`]: Fixed lint attribute interaction

r? `@wesleywiser`

cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97660, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549

And I guess that's it. Here have a magical unicorn 🦄
2022-07-07 18:06:50 +05:30
Camille GILLOT
347d999b97 Shorten span for closures. 2022-07-07 09:27:42 +02:00
xFrednet
0d443d17eb Fix #[expect] and #[allow] for clippy::duplicate_mod 2022-07-06 22:01:40 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
e34ee2484b fix miri-opt tests 2022-07-06 19:09:50 +09:00
Camille GILLOT
d5e33d3ded Shorten def_span for more items. 2022-07-01 17:39:19 +02:00
Philipp Krones
09f5df5087 Merge commit '0cb0f7636851f9fcc57085cf80197a2ef6db098f' into clippyup 2022-06-30 10:50:09 +02:00
Maybe Waffle
ee37029afa remove last use of MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES 2022-06-20 00:25:07 +04:00
Maybe Waffle
9395c261d6 remove span_lint_and_sugg_for_edges from clippy utils 2022-06-19 23:21:14 +04:00
Matthias Krüger
4737e9e42b Rollup merge of #98165 - WaffleLapkin:once_things_renamings, r=m-ou-se
once cell renamings

This PR does the renamings proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74465#issuecomment-1153703128

- Move/rename `lazy::{OnceCell, Lazy}` to `cell::{OnceCell, LazyCell}`
- Move/rename `lazy::{SyncOnceCell, SyncLazy}` to `sync::{OnceLock, LazyLock}`

(I used `Lazy...` instead of `...Lazy` as it seems to be more consistent, easier to pronounce, etc)

```@rustbot``` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
2022-06-19 00:17:13 +02:00
bors
09c93018d7 Auto merge of #97892 - klensy:fix-spaces, r=oli-obk
diagnostics: remove trailing spaces

Remove few occurrences of trailing spaces and drive by fix of needless alloc of const string.
2022-06-17 17:30:16 +00:00
Dylan DPC
51e2d6a4a9 Rollup merge of #97798 - WaffleLapkin:allow_for_suggestions_that_are_quite_far_away_from_each_other, r=estebank
Hide irrelevant lines in suggestions to allow for suggestions that are far from each other to be shown

This is an attempt to fix suggestions one part of which is 6 lines or more far from the first. I've noticed "the problem" (of not showing some parts of the suggestion) here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97759#discussion_r889689230.

I'm not sure about the implementation (this big closure is just bad and makes already complicated code even more so), but I want to at least discuss the result.

Here is an example of how this changes the output:

Before:
```text
help: consider enclosing expression in a block
  |
3 ~     'l: { match () { () => break 'l,
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
...
```

After:
```text
help: consider enclosing expression in a block
  |
3 ~     'l: { match () { () => break 'l,
4 |
...
31|
32~ } };
  |
```

r? `@estebank`
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics
2022-06-17 12:21:48 +02:00
Maybe Waffle
f095f802dc Move/rename lazy::Sync{OnceCell,Lazy} to sync::{Once,Lazy}Lock 2022-06-16 19:54:42 +04:00
flip1995
f8f9d01c2a Merge commit 'd7b5cbf065b88830ca519adcb73fad4c0d24b1c7' into clippyup 2022-06-16 17:39:06 +02:00
Maybe Waffle
4d88993544 bless clippy ui tests 2022-06-16 18:00:32 +04:00
klensy
922ff84baf bless clippy tests 2022-06-16 15:51:12 +03:00
bors
34f2839683 Auto merge of #95565 - jackh726:remove-borrowck-mode, r=nikomatsakis
Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes #58781
Closes #43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: #43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64790)
2022-06-07 05:04:14 +00:00
Philipp Krones
7713f28f54 Remove unnecessary clap_derive dependency added in 9ee211af
The fixed issue in this commit can be tested without depending on
clap/clap_derive. This updates the test case to do so.
2022-06-04 14:04:35 +02:00
Philipp Krones
f067783461 Merge commit 'd9ddce8a223cb9916389c039777b6966ea448dc8' into clippyup 2022-06-04 13:34:07 +02:00
Jack Huey
1fad95309b Fully stabilize NLL 2022-06-03 17:16:41 -04:00
xFrednet
4587b6628d Merge 'rust-clippy/master' into clippyup 2022-05-21 13:24:00 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
31825326e5 Bless clippy. 2022-05-11 18:51:14 +02:00
bors
670bc53c03 Auto merge of #95542 - xFrednet:rfc-2383-expect-query, r=wesleywiser
Support tool lints with the `#[expect]` attribute (RFC 2383)

This PR fixes the ICE https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953 by making the assert for converted expectation IDs conditional.

Additionally, it moves the lint expectation check into a separate query to support rustdoc and other tools. On the way, I've also added some tests to ensure that the attribute works for Clippy and rustdoc lints.

The number of changes comes from the long test file. This may look like a monster PR, this may smell like a monster PR and this may be a monster PR, but it's a harmless monster. 🦕

---

Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953

cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549

r? `@wesleywiser`

cc: `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
2022-05-09 00:02:55 +00:00
bors
1d018ce47c Auto merge of #96770 - flip1995:fix-trait-type-in-bounds, r=cjgillot
Track if a where bound comes from a impl Trait desugar

With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a `impl Trait` or an actual bound. This adds a field to the `WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during AST->HIR lowering.

r? `@cjgillot`

cc `@estebank` (as the reviewer of #93803)
2022-05-08 14:10:12 +00:00