rustc: Remove the `used_unsafe` field on TyCtxt
Now that lint levels are available for the entire compilation, this can be an
entirely local lint in `effect.rs`
cc #44137
add a lowercase suggestion to unknown_lints
I recently wrote some tests for a clippy lint, copied the (uppercase) lint name into my test file and forgot to toggle the case. This PR adds a suggestion that would have saved me 10 minutes of debugging, so it's likely a net win 🙂 . Also it adds a UI test for the `unknown_lints` lint.
Remove the trait selection impl in method::probe
This removes the hacky trait selection reimplementation in `method::probe`, which occasionally comes and causes problems.
There are 2 issues I've found with this approach:
1. The older implementation sometimes had a "guess" type from an impl, which allowed subtyping to work. This is why I needed to make a change in `libtest`: there's an `impl<A> Clone for fn(A)` and we're calling `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone`. The older implementation would do a subtyping between the impl type and the trait type, so it would do the check for `<fn(A) as Clone>::clone`, and confirmation would continue with the subtyping. The newer implementation directly passes `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone` to selection, which fails. I'm not sure how big of a problem that would be in reality, especially after #43690 would remove the `Clone` problem, but I still want a crater run to avoid breaking the world.
2. The older implementation "looked into" impls to display error messages. I'm not sure that's an advantage - it looked exactly 1 level deep.
r? @eddyb
feature error span on attribute for fn_must_use, SIMD/align reprs, macro reëxport
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available
error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it
would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the
attribute is removed, the function/struct/_&c._ likely still makes sense and the
program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for
the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is
little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the
feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with
the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point
to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the
function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will
compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the
`main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which
there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
Fix a byte/char confusion issue in the error emitter
Fixes#44078. Fixes#44023.
The start_col member is given in chars, while the code previously assumed it was given in bytes.
The more basic issue #44080 doesn't get fixed.
Fixes#44078. Fixes#44023.
The start_col member is given in chars,
while the code previously assumed it was given in bytes.
The more basic issue #44080 doesn't get fixed.
Adding E0623 for structs
This is a fix to #43275
The error message is
```
+error[E0623]: lifetime mismatch
+ --> $DIR/ex3-both-anon-regions-both-are-structs.rs:15:12
+ |
+14 | fn foo(mut x: Vec<Ref>, y: Ref) {
+ | --- --- these structs are declared with different lifetimes...
+15 | x.push(y);
+ | ^ ...but data from `y` flows into `x` here
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
```
r? @nikomatsakis
We'll actually want a new "soft" warning-only gate to maintain
backwards-compatibility, but it's cleaner to start out with the established,
well-understood gate before implementing the alternative warn-only behavior in
a later commit.
This is in the matter of #43302.
Point out missing if conditional
On a case where an else conditional is missing, point this out
instead of the token immediately after the (incorrect) else block:
```
error: missing condition for `if` statemementt push fork -f
--> $DIR/issue-13483.rs:16:5
|
13 | } else if {
| ^ expected if condition here
```
instead of
```
error: expected `{`, found `else`
--> ../../src/test/ui/issue-13483.rs:14:7
|
14 | } else {
| ^^^^
```
Fix#13483.
On a case where an else conditional is missing, point this out
instead of the token immediately after the (incorrect) else block:
```
error: missing condition for `if` statemementt push fork -f
--> $DIR/issue-13483.rs:16:5
|
13 | } else if {
| ^ expected if condition here
```
instead of
```
error: expected `{`, found `else`
--> ../../src/test/ui/issue-13483.rs:14:7
|
14 | } else {
| ^^^^
```
