Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #109909 (Deny `use`ing tool paths)
- #109921 (Don't ICE when encountering `dyn*` in statics or consts)
- #109922 (Disable `has_thread_local` on OpenHarmony)
- #109926 (write threads info into log only when debugging)
- #109968 (Add regression test for #80409)
- #109969 (Add regression test for #86351)
- #109973 (rustdoc: Improve logo display very small screen)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't ICE when encountering `dyn*` in statics or consts
Since we have properly implemented `dyn*` support in CTFE (#107728), let's not ICE here anymore.
Fixes#105777
r? `@eholk`
Use SipHash-1-3 instead of SipHash-2-4 for StableHasher
Noticed this, and it seems easy and likely a perf win. IIUC we don't need DDOS resistance (just collision) so we ideally would have an even faster hash, but it's hard to beat this SipHash impl here, since it's been so highly tuned for the interface.
It wouldn't surprise me if there's some subtle reason changing this sucks, as it's so obvious it seems likely to have been done. Still, SipHash-1-3 seems to still have the guarantees StableHasher should need (and seemingly more), and is clearly less work. So it's worth a shot.
Not fully tested locally.
Validate `ignore` and `only` compiletest directive, and add human-readable ignore reasons
This PR adds strict validation for the `ignore` and `only` compiletest directives, failing if an unknown value is provided to them. Doing so uncovered 79 tests in `tests/ui` that had invalid directives, so this PR also fixes them.
Finally, this PR adds human-readable ignore reasons when tests are ignored due to `ignore` or `only` directives, like *"only executed when the architecture is aarch64"* or *"ignored when the operative system is windows"*. This was the original reason why I started working on this PR and #108659, as we need both of them for Ferrocene.
The PR is a draft because the code is extremely inefficient: it calls `rustc --print=cfg --target $target` for every rustc target (to gather the list of allowed ignore values), which on my system takes between 4s and 5s, and performs a lot of allocations of constant values. I'll fix both of them in the coming days.
r? `@ehuss`
Do not suppress temporary_cstring_as_ptr in macros.
There isn't really a reason to skip the lint when part of the expression comes from an expansion.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94694
Move a const-prop-lint specific hack from mir interpret to const-prop-lint and make it fallible
fixes#109743
This hack didn't need to live in the mir interpreter. For const-prop-lint it is entirely correct to avoid doing any const prop if normalization fails at this stage. Most likely we couldn't const propagate anything anyway, and if revealing was needed (so opaque types were involved), we wouldn't want to be too smart and leak the hidden type anyway.
Emit feature error for parenthesized generics in associated type bounds
We don't actually do AST->HIR lowering with some `-Zunpretty` flags, so it's not correct to just delay a bug instead of emitting a feature error.
Some diagnostics regressed because of the new errors, but oh well. 🤷Fixes#109898
Fix `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint span
Fixes#109837
`DUMMY_SP` was being passed as the span in many cases where we have a span available to use. This meant that the location of the violating pattern wasn't shown, or the list of un-covered variants
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Never consider int and float vars for `FnPtr` candidates
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
For integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to add a test.
I'm not sure whether there could be more issues hidden in the shadows as mentioned in the issue, but this should at least fix the problematic regression immediately.
fixes#109892
r? oli-obk
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom
trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
FOr integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to
add a test.
Drop array patterns using subslices
Fixes#109004
Drops contiguous subslices of an array when moving elements out with a pattern, which improves perf for large arrays
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix subslice capture in closure
Fixes#109298 by refining captures in the same way for Subslices and Indexes. The comment `// we never capture this` seems to have been inaccurate, as changing it to an assert causes many test failures
`@rustbot` label +A-closures
Move `doc(primitive)` future incompat warning to `invalid_doc_attributes`
Fixes#88070.
It's been a while since this was turned into a "future incompatible lint" so I think we can now turn it into a hard error without problem.
r? `@jyn514`
Initial support for return type notation (RTN)
See: https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/02/13/return-type-notation-send-bounds-part-2/
1. Only supports `T: Trait<method(): Send>` style bounds, not `<T as Trait>::method(): Send`. Checking validity and injecting an implicit binder for all of the late-bound method generics is harder to do for the latter.
* I'd add this in a follow-up.
3. ~Doesn't support RTN in general type position, i.e. no `let x: <T as Trait>::method() = ...`~
* I don't think we actually want this.
5. Doesn't add syntax for "eliding" the function args -- i.e. for now, we write `method(): Send` instead of `method(..): Send`.
* May be a hazard if we try to add it in the future. I'll probably add it in a follow-up later, with a structured suggestion to change `method()` to `method(..)` once we add it.
7. ~I'm not in love with the feature gate name 😺~
* I renamed it to `return_type_notation` ✔️
Follow-up PRs will probably add support for `where T::method(): Send` bounds. I'm not sure if we ever want to support return-type-notation in arbitrary type positions. I may also make the bounds require `..` in the args list later.
r? `@ghost`
