New lint `ignored_unit_patterns`
This idea comes from #11238. I've put the lint in `pedantic` as it might trigger numerous positives (three in Clippy itself).
changelog: [`ignored_unit_patterns`]: new lint
New lint [`needless_return_with_try`]
Closes#10902
Rather than having a config option, this will just suggest removing the "return"; if `try_err` is used as well, then it'll be added again but without the `?`.
changelog: New lint [`needless_return_with_try`]
`unwrap_or_else_default` -> `unwrap_or_default` and improve resulting lint
Resolves#10080 (though it doesn't implement exactly what's described there)
This PR does the following:
1. Merges `unwrap_or_else_default.rs`'s code into `or_fun_call.rs`
2. Extracts the code to handle `unwrap_or(/* default value */)` and similar, and moves it into `unwrap_or_else_default`
3. Implements the missing functionality from #9342, e.g.,, to handle `or_insert_with(Default::default)`
4. Renames `unwrap_or_else_default` to `unwrap_or_default` (since the "new" lint handles both `unwrap_or` and `unwrap_or_else`, it seemed sensible to use the shortened name)
This PR is currently two commits. The first implements 1-3, the second implements 4.
A word about 2: the `or_fun_call` lint currently produces warnings like the following:
```
error: use of `unwrap_or` followed by a call to `new`
--> $DIR/or_fun_call.rs:56:14
|
LL | with_new.unwrap_or(Vec::new());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `unwrap_or_default()`
```
To me, such warnings look like they should come from `unwrap_or_else_default`, not `or_fun_call`, especially since `or_fun_call` is [in the nursery](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9829).
---
changelog: Move: Renamed `unwrap_or_else_default` to [`unwrap_or_default`]
[#10120](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10120)
changelog: Enhancement: [`unwrap_or_default`]: Now handles more functions, like `or_insert_with`
[#10120](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10120)
<!-- changelog_checked-->
fix dogfood lints in `redundant_local`
keep `redundant_local` from running in proc macros
rewrite `redundant_local` as late pass
make redundant_local's `find_binding` more readable
pluralize `redundant_locals` name
add test for `redundant_locals` in macros
test `redundant_locals` in proc macros
use more destructuring in `redundant_locals`
fix: format redundant_locals.rs
ignore needless_pass_by_mut_ref in redundant_locals test
Add `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` lint
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_ref_mut`]: This PR add a new lint `needless_pass_by_ref_mut` which emits a warning in case a `&mut` function argument isn't used mutably. It doesn't warn on trait and trait impls functions.
Fixes#8863.
cargo dev fmt
cargo test passes
cargo test passes
refactor a lil
Update bool_comparison.stderr
heavily refactor + bump `clippy::version`
refactor
refactor
check bounds to increase accuracy, and add todos
new lint: `type_id_on_box`
Closes#7687.
A new lint that detects calling `.type_id()` on `Box<dyn Any>` (and not on the underlying `dyn Any`), which can make up for some pretty confusing bugs!
changelog: new lint: [`type_id_on_box`]
New lint [`tuple_array_conversions`]
Closes#10748
PS, the implementation is a bit ugly 😅 ~~I will likely refactor soon enough :)~~ Done :D
changelog: New lint [`tuple_array_conversions`]
New lint [`redundant_at_rest_pattern`]
Closes#11011
It's always a great feeling when a new lint triggers on clippy itself 😄
changelog: New lint [`redundant_at_rest_pattern`]
new lint [`single_range_in_vec_init`]
Lints on `vec![0..200]` (or `[0..200]`), suggesting either `(0..200).collect::<Vec<i32>>()` or `[0; 200]`.
Haven't tested it with anything that isn't primitive. Probably should!
Closes#10932
changelog: new lint [`single_range_in_vec_init`]
Add lints for disallowing usage of `to_xx_bytes` and `from_xx_bytes`
Adds `host_endian_bytes`, `little_endian_bytes` and `big_endian_bytes`
Closes#10765
v - not sure what to put here since this adds 3 lints
changelog: Add `host_endian_bytes`, `little_endian_bytes` and `big_endian_bytes` lints
Update *Current stable* text in `CHANGELOG.md`
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
the new version was released,
and our changelog too
---
changelog: none
move some strings into consts, more tests
s/missing_field_in_debug/missing_fields_in_debug
dont trigger in macro expansions
make dogfood tests happy
minor cleanups
replace HashSet with FxHashSet
replace match_def_path with match_type
if_chain -> let chains, fix markdown, allow newtype pattern
fmt
consider string literal in `.field()` calls as used
don't intern defined symbol, remove mentions of 'debug_tuple'
special-case PD, account for field access through `Deref`
Add new lint `ptr_cast_constness`
This adds a new lint which functions as the opposite side of the coin to `ptr_as_ptr`. Rather than linting only as casts that don't change constness, this lints only constness; suggesting to use `pointer::cast_const` or `pointer::cast_mut` instead.
changelog: new lint [`ptr_cast_constness`]
fix: warn on empty line outer AttrKind::DocComment
changelog: [`empty_line_after_doc_comments`]: add lint for checking empty lines after rustdoc comments.
Fixes: #10395
Fixes#10609: Adds lint to detect construction of unit struct using `default`
Using `default` to construct a unit struct increases code complexity and adds a function call. This can be avoided by simply removing the call to `default` and simply construct by name.
changelog: [`default_constructed_unit_structs`]: detects construction of unit structs using `default`
fixes#10609
Using `default` to construct a unit struct increases code complexity and
adds a function call. This can be avoided by simply removing the call to
`default` and simply construct by name.
New lint: detect `if` expressions with simple boolean assignments to the same target
Closes#10430
changelog: [`needless_bool_assign`] new lint to detect simple boolean assignment to the same target in `if` branches
Added the `[unnecessary_box_returns]` lint
fixes#5
I'm not confident in the name of this lint. Let me know if you can think of something better
---
changelog: New lint: ``[`unnecessary_box_returns`]``
[#9102](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9102)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `collection_is_never_read`
Fixes#9267
`@flip1995` and `@llogiq,` I talked with you about this one at Rust Nation in London last week. :-)
This is my first contribution to Clippy, so lots of feedback would be greatly appreciated.
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
`dogfood` found one true positive (see #9509) and no false positives.
`lintcheck` found no (true or false) positives, even when running on an extended set of crates.
---
changelog: new lint [`collection_is_never_read`]
[#10415](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10415)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `impl_trait_in_params` lint
As this is a lint about style, and using `impl Trait` is purely cosmetical (even with downsides), a lot of unrelated files needed to allow this lint.
---
Resolves#10030
changelog: New lint: [`impl_trait_in_params`]
[10197](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10197)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add question-mark-used lint
This lint complains when the question mark operator (try operator) is used. This is a restriction lint that can be useful on local scopes where a custom error handling macro is supposed to be used to augment the error based on local scope data before returning.
Fixes#10340
---
changelog: New lint [`question_mark_used`]
[#10342](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10342)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `let_underscore_untyped`
Fixes#6842
This adds a new pedantic `let_underscore_untyped` lint which checks for `let _ = <expr>`, and suggests to either provide a type annotation, or to remove the `let` keyword. That way the author is forced to specify the type they intended to ignore, and thus get forced to re-visit the decision should the type of `<expr>` change. Alternatively, they can drop the `let` keyword to truly just ignore the value no matter what.
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: New lint: [let_underscore_untyped]
[significant_drop_tightening] Add MVP
cc #9399
Creates the lint with minimum functionalities, which is a good start IMO.
---
changelog: new lint: [`significant_drop_tightening`]
[#10163](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10163)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
As this is a lint about "style", and a purely cosmetical choice (using `<A: Trait>` over `impl Trait`), a lot of other files needed to be allowed this lint.
This lint complains when the question mark operator (try operator)
is used. This is a restriction lint that can be useful on local
scopes where a custom error handling macro is supposed to be used
to augment the error based on local scope data before returning.
Add size_of_ref lint
This addresses #9995, which is likely raising a valid point about `std::mem::size_of_val()`: It's [very easy to use double-references as the argument](https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4371#discussion_r1032385224), which the function will happily accept and give back the size of _the reference_, not the size of the value _behind_ the reference. In the worst case, if the value matches the programmer's expectation, this seems to work, while in fact, everything will go horribly wrong e.g. on a different platform.
The size of a `&T` is independent of what `T` is, and people might want to use `std::mem::size_of_val()` to actually get the size of _any_ reference (e.g. via `&&()`). I would rather suggest that this is always bad behavior, though ([instead](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html#pointers-and-references-layout), [and](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.usize.html#associatedconstant.BITS)). I, therefore, put this lint into `correctness`.
Since the problem is usually easily fixed by removing extra `&`, I went light on suggesting code.
---
changelog: New lint: [`size_of_ref`]
[#10098](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10098)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Changelog 1.66
It's really nice to see a changelog with so many suggestion fixes and improvements. Not much else to say. This should be merged with the coming release on 2022-12-15. For the reviewer, please review it and approve it if it looks good. The merge should wait until the release :)
---
changelog: none
<!-- changelog_checked -->
feat: lint unchecked subtraction of a 'Duration' from an 'Instant'
Hello all, I tried to tackle the open issue #9371 and this is what I came up with.
I have a difficulty currently - some tests are failing:
```
failures:
[ui] ui/manual_instant_elapsed.rs
```
The `manual_instant_elapsed` is failing because of `Instant::now() - duration` test, this now gets also picked by `unchecked_duration_subtraction` lint.
What is the correct way to proceed in this case? Simply update the `.stderr` file for `manual_instant_elapsed` lint?
changelog: [`unchecked_duration_subtraction`]: Add lint for unchecked subtraction of a `Duration` from an `Instant`.
fixes#9371
Add `manual_is_ascii_check` lint
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9290
This PR adds new lint `manual_is_ascii_check`, which detects comparison with ascii ranges using `matches!` macros.
As I mentioned as following in the Issue;
> Yes, that's true. we'll start small and then grow it.
> So I'll try to handle matches! macro with single range as suggested above.
However during writing first version, I was thinking that the changes to support alphabetic and digits will be small patch, so I made a single PR in hope review cost can be reduced.
changelog: add new lint [`manual_is_ascii_check`]
r? `@xFrednet`
Changelog for Rust 1.65
Roses are red,
violets are blue,
another 6 weeks,
another changelog, yahoo!
This did not rhyme,
luckily, not a crime.
I want to say something smart,
but I am out of time.
---
Note for the reviewer. This PR is written, as if Rust was already released on 2022-11-03. Please review the changes and approve if you agree, but only merge it after the release. :)
---
changelog: none
Add lint for confusing use of `^` instead of `.pow`
fixes#4205
Adds a lint named [`confusing_xor_and_pow`], it warns the user when `a ^ b` is used as the `.pow()` function, it doesn't warn for Hex, Binary... etc.
---
changelog: New lint: [`confusing_xor_and_pow`]
add new lint `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind `
changelog: `seek_to_start_instead_of_rewind`: new lint to suggest using `rewind` instead of `seek` to start
Resolve#8600
Add `unused_format_specs` lint
Currently catches two cases:
An empty precision specifier:
```rust
// the same as {}
println!("{:.}", x);
```
And using formatting specs on `format_args!()`:
```rust
// prints `x.`, not `x .`
println("{:5}.", format_args!("x"));
```
changelog: new lint: [`unused_format_specs`]
Add `manual_filter` lint for `Option`
Share much of its implementation with `manual_map` and should greatly benefit from its previous feedback.
I'm sure it's possible to even more refactor both and would gladly take input on that as well as any clippy idiomatic usage, since this is my first lint addition.
I've added the lint to the complexity section for now, I don't know if every new lint needs to go in nursery first.
The matching could be expanded to more than `Some(<value>)` to lint on arbitrary struct matching inside the `Some` but I've left it like it was for `manual_map` for now. `needless_match::pat_same_as_expr` provides a more generic match example.
close https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8822
changelog: Add lint [`manual_filter`] for `Option`
This lint detects calls to a `&self`-taking `as_ptr` method, where
the result is then immediately cast to a `*mut T`. Code like this
is probably invalid, as that pointer will not have write permissions,
and `*mut T` is usually used to write through.
add `box-default` lint
This adds a `box-default` lint to suggest using `Box::default()` instead of `Box::new(Default::default())`, which offers less moving parts and potentially better performance according to [the perf book](https://nnethercote.github.io/perf-book/standard-library-types.html#box).
---
changelog: add [`box_default`] lint
Implement https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8368 - a new
lint to inline format arguments such as `print!("{}", var)` into
`print!("{var}")`.
code | suggestion | comment
---|---|---
`print!("{}", var)` | `print!("{var}")` | simple variables
`print!("{0}", var)` | `print!("{var}")` | positional variables
`print!("{v}", v=var)` | `print!("{var}")` | named variables
`print!("{0} {0}", var)` | `print!("{var} {var}")` | aliased variables
`print!("{0:1$}", var, width)` | `print!("{var:width$}")` | width
support
`print!("{0:.1$}", var, prec)` | `print!("{var:.prec$}")` | precision
support
`print!("{:.*}", prec, var)` | `print!("{var:.prec$}")` | asterisk
support
code | suggestion | comment
---|---|---
`print!("{0}={1}", var, 1+2)` | `print!("{var}={0}", 1+2)` | Format
string uses an indexed argument that cannot be inlined. Supporting this
case requires re-indexing of the format string.
changelog: [`uninlined_format_args`]: A new lint to inline format
arguments, i.e. `print!("{}", var)` into `print!("{var}")`
This is done because `to_owned` is very similarly named to `into_owned`, but the
effect of calling those two methods is completely different. This creates
confusion (stemming from the ambiguity of the 'owned' term in the context of
`Cow`s) and might not be what the writer intended.
new lint
This fixes#6576
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: add [`multi_assignments`] lint
Lint `collapsible_str_replace`
fixes#6651
```
changelog: [`collapsible_str_replace`]: create new lint `collapsible_str_replace`
```
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`]
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: Add new lint [`positional_named_format_parameters`] to warn when named parameters in format strings are used as positional arguments.
Add lint recommending using `std::iter::once` and `std::iter::empty`
```
changelog: [`iter_once`]: add new lint
changelog: [`iter_empty`]: add new lint
```
fixes#9186
- \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
The lint doesn't really follow the naming conventions. I don't have any better idea so I'm open to suggestions.
Add partialeq_to_none lint
Initial implementation of #9275, adding lint `partialeq_to_none`. This is my first time working on `clippy`, so please review carefully.
I'm unsure especially about the `Sugg`, as it covers the entire `BinOp`, instead of just covering one of the sides and the operator (see the multi-line example). I was unsure if pinpointing the suggestion wouldn't be brittle...
changelog: [`PARTIALEQ_TO_NONE`]: Initial commit
Add new lint `obfuscated_if_else`
part of #9100, additional commits could make it work with `then` and `unwrap_or_else` as well
changelog: Add new lint `obfuscated_if_else`
