This change reduces duplication by linking the documentation for
`writeln!` to `write!`. It also restructures the `write!` documentation
to read in a more logical manner.
Updates #29329, #29381
rustbuild: Update bootstrap compiler
Now that we've also updated cargo's release process this commit also changes the
download location of Cargo from Cargos archives back to the static.r-l.o
archives. This should ensure that the Cargo download is the exact Cargo paired
with the rustc that we release.
When making a forwarding wrapper we must in general forward all methods,
so that we use the type's own `lt` for example instead of the default.
Example important case: f32's partial_cmp does several operations but
its lt is a primitive.
When in debug_assertions=true mode, the function consume_body lacks some debug output, which makes it harder to follow the control flow. This commit adds this needed debug.
change the strategy for diverging types
The new strategy is as follows. First, the `!` type is assigned
in two cases:
- a block with a diverging statement and no tail expression (e.g.,
`{return;}`);
- any expression with the type `!` is considered diverging.
Second, we track when we are in a diverging state, and we permit a value
of any type to be coerced **into** `!` if the expression that produced
it is diverging. This means that `fn foo() -> ! { panic!(); 22 }`
type-checks, even though the block has a type of `usize`.
Finally, coercions **from** the `!` type to any other are always
permitted.
Fixes#39808.
Fixes#39984.
The `try_coerce` method coerces from a source to a target
type, possibly inserting adjustments. It should guarantee
that the post-adjustment type is a subtype of the target type
(or else that some side-constraint has been registered which will lead
to an error). However, it used to return the (possibly adjusted) source
as the type of the expression rather than the target. This led to
less good downstream errors.
To work around this, the code around blocks -- and particular tail
expressions in blocks -- had some special case manipulation. However,
since that code is now using the more general `CoerceMany` construct (to
account for breaks), it can no longer take advantage of that. This lead
to some regressions in compile-fail tests were errors were reported at
"less good" locations than before.
This change modifies coercions to return the target type when successful
rather the source type. This extends the behavior from blocks to all
coercions. Typically this has limited effect but on a few tests yielded
better errors results (and avoided regressions, of course).
This change also restores the hint about removing semicolons which went
missing (by giving 'force-unit' coercions a chance to add notes etc).
For the most part, the current code performs similarly, although it
differs in some particulars. I'll be nice to have these tests for
judging future changes, as well.
First, we keep a `CoerceMany` now to find the LUB of all the break
expressions. Second, this `CoerceMany` is actually an
`Option<CoerceMany>`, and we store `None` for loops where "break with an
expression" is disallowed. This avoids silly duplicate errors about a
type mismatch, since the loops pass already reports an error that the
break cannot have an expression. Finally, since we now detect an invalid
break target during HIR lowering, refactor `find_loop` to be infallible.
Adjust tests as needed:
- some spans from breaks are slightly different
- break up a single loop into multiple since `CoerceMany` silences
redundant and derived errors
- add a ui test that we only give on error for loop-break-value
Instead, wait until coercion time. This has some small effects on a few
tests (one less temporary, generally better errors when trying to call
methods or otherwise "force" the type).
`match { }` now (correctly?) indicates divergence, which results in more
unreachable warnings. We also avoid fallback to `!` if there is just one
arm (see new test: `match-unresolved-one-arm.rs`).
The new strategy is as follows. First, the `!` type is assigned
in two cases:
- a block with a diverging statement and no tail expression (e.g.,
`{return;}`);
- any expression with the type `!` is considered diverging.
Second, we track when we are in a diverging state, and we permit a value
of any type to be coerced **into** `!` if the expression that produced
it is diverging. This means that `fn foo() -> ! { panic!(); 22 }`
type-checks, even though the block has a type of `usize`.
Finally, coercions **from** the `!` type to any other are always
permitted.
Fixes#39808.
In master, this field was an arbitrary node-id (in fact, an id for
something that doesn't even exist in the HIR -- the `catch` node).
Breaks targeting this block used that id. In the newer system, this
field is a boolean, and any breaks targeted this block will use the
id of the block.
