A metadata collection monster
This PR introduces a metadata collection lint as discussed in #4310. It currently collects:
* The lint ID
* The lint declaration file and location (for #1303)
* The lint group
* The documentation
* The applicability (if resolvable)
* If the suggestion is a multi-part-suggestion
This data has a slightly different structure than the current [lints.json](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/gh-pages/master/lints.json) and doesn't include depreciated lints yet. I plan to adapt the website to the new format and include depreciated lints in a follow-up PR :). The current collected json looks like this: [metadata_collection.json](https://gist.github.com/xFrednet/6b9e2c3f725f476ba88db9563f67e119)
The entire implementation is guarded behind the `metadata-collector-lint` feature and the `ENABLE_METADATA_COLLECTION` environment value to prevent default collection. You can test the implementation via:
```sh
$ ENABLE_METADATA_COLLECTION=1 cargo test --test dogfood --all-features
```
changelog: none
---
The size of this PR sadly also grew into a small monster, sorry! I definitely plan to improve on this! And it's totally okay if you take your time with this :)
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@flip1995`
needless_collect: Lint cases with type annotations for indirect usage and recognize `BinaryHeap`
fixes#7110
changelog: needless_collect: Lint cases with type annotations for indirect usage and recognize `BinaryHeap`.
Move all `sys::ext` modules to `os`
This PR moves all `sys::ext` modules to `os`, centralizing the location of all `os` code and simplifying the dependencies between `os` and `sys`.
Because this also removes all uses `cfg_if!` on publicly exported items, where after #81969 there were still a few left, this should properly work around https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6038.
`@rustbot` label: +T-libs-impl
Producing a good suggestion for this lint is already hard when no macros
are involved. With macros the lint message and the suggestion are just
confusing. Since both, producing a good suggestion and figuring out if
this pattern can be re-written inside a macro is nearly impossible, just
bail out.
Update BARE_TRAIT_OBJECT and ELLIPSIS_INCLUSIVE_RANGE_PATTERNS to errors in Rust 2021
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81244 by updating two lints to errors in the Rust 2021 edition.
r? `@estebank`
[single_char_pattern] add strip_prefix and strip_suffix
Title says it all. Adjusted ui tests.
I added the second commit in case you don't like that I moved that table into `single_char_pattern.rs` directly. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be in that file. It isn't used anywhere else.
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: add strip_prefix and strip_suffix to single_char_pattern lint
`Conf` macro improvements part 2
changelog: none
Follow-up to #7150
I made the default value required again for `define_Conf!` so that it can be parsed by the magic Python. I guess it's just as well for readability.
r? `@flip1995`
