Zeroing on-drop seems to work fine. Still thinking about the best way to approach zeroing on-move.
(based on top of the other drop PR; only the last 2 commits are relevant)
This will correctly add the thread_local attribute to the external static variable ```errno```:
```rust
extern {
#[thread_local]
static errno: c_int;
}
```
Before this commit, the thread_local attribute is ignored. Fixes#30795.
Thanks @alexcrichton for pointing out the solution.
This PR changes the visibility of extern crate declarations to match that of items (fixes#26775).
To avoid breakage, the PR makes it a `public_in_private` lint to reexport a private extern crate, and it adds the lint `inaccessible_extern_crate` for uses of an inaccessible extern crate.
The lints can be avoided by making the appropriate `extern crate` declaration public.
Hopefully the author caught all the cases. For the mir_dynamic_drops_3 test case the ratio of
memsets to other instructions is 12%. On the other hand we actually do not double drop for at least
the test cases provided anymore in MIR.
The issue was that the const evaluator was returning an error because
the feature flag const_indexing wasn't turned on. The error was then
reported as a bug.
Fixes#29914
Needs a correct review because I'm not too confident with how this works.
All tests related to the C ABI are now passing.
References:
- dbe68fecd0/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp (L479-L489)
- dbe68fecd0/lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp (L466-L477)
The `classifyArgumentType` function has two different paths depending on `RAA == CGCXXABI::RAA_DirectInMemory`, but I don't really know what's the corresponding option in Rust.
cc @brson @eddyb
Back in 9bc8e6d14 the linking of rlibs changed to using the `link_whole_rlib`
function. This change, however was only intended to affect dylibs, not
executables. For executables we don't actually want to link entire rlibs because
we want the linker to strip out as much as possible.
This commit adds a conditional to this logic to only link entire rlibs if we're
creating a dylib, and otherwise an executable just links an rlib as usual. A
test is included which will fail to link if this behavior is reverted.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31487#issuecomment-182945101
plugin-[breaking-change]
The first commit renames `ast::Pat_` to `ast::PatKind` and uses its variants in enum qualified form. I've also taken the opportunity and renamed `PatKind::Region` into `PatKind::Ref`.
The second commit splits `PatKind::Enum` into `PatKind::TupleStruct` and `PatKind::UnitStruct`.
So, pattern kinds now correspond to their struct/variant kinds - `Struct`, `TupleStruct` and `UnitStruct`.
@nikomatsakis @nrc @arielb1 Are you okay with this naming scheme?
An alternative possible naming scheme is `PatKind::StructVariant`, `PatKind::TupleVariant`, `PatKind::UnitVariant` (it's probably closer to the common use, but I like it less).
I intend to apply these changes to HIR later, they should not necessarily go in the same nightly with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31487
r? @Manishearth
The issue was that the const evaluator was returning an error because
the feature flag const_indexing wasn't turned on. The error was then
reported as a bug.
Fixes#29914
<sup>**context:** moving back to a layered approach to type checking.</sup>
It looks like they'd not ended up tightly coupled in the time one was owned by the other. Every instance outside of `FnCtxt.inh` was from an `InferCtxt` created and dropped in the same function body.
This conflicts slightly with #30652, but there too it looks like the `FulfillmentContext` is from an `InferCtxt` that is created and dropped within the same function body (across one call to a module-private function).
That said, I heard that the PR that originally moved `FulfillmentContext` into `InferCtxt` was big, which leaves me concerned that I'm missing something.
r? @nikomatsakis
This changes three ICEs to fatal errors.
I've grepped for `lang_item.*expect` and `\.expect.*lang` and didn't come up with any more. But, there could be more ICEs lurking.
I wasn't sure about a test because there already _is_ a cfail test for missing lang items, but it only checks one.
Relevant to (already closed) #31477#31480#31558.
cc @lilred
r? @brson
cc @alexcrichton
I still need to add error code explanation test with this, but I can't figure out a way to generate the `.md` files in order to test example source codes.
Will fix#27328.
Tools which rely on DWARF for generating code coverage report, don't generate accurate numbers on test builds. For instance, [this sample main](757bdbf388/src/main.rs) returns [100% coverage](https://coveralls.io/builds/4940156/source?filename=main.rs) when [kcov](https://github.com/SimonKagstrom/kcov/) runs.
With @pnkfelix 's great help, we could narrow down the issue: The linker strips unused function during phase 6. Here's a patch which stops stripping when someone calls `rustc --test $ARGS`. @pnkfelix wasn't sure if we should add a new flag, or just use --test. What do you think @alexcrichton ?
Also, I'm not too sure: where is the best place to add a test for this addition?
Thanks for the help!
This series of commits adds the initial implementation of a new build system for
the compiler and standard library based on Cargo. The high-level architecture
now looks like:
1. The `./configure` script is run with `--enable-rustbuild` and other standard
configuration options.
2. A `Makefile` is generate which proxies commands to the new build system.
3. The new build system has a Python script entry point which manages
downloading both a Rust and Cargo nightly. This initial script also manages
building the build system itself (which is written in Rust).
4. The build system, written in rust and called `bootstrap`, architects how to
call `cargo` and manages building all native libraries and such.
One might reasonably ask "why rewrite the build system?", which is a good
question! The Rust project has used Makefiles for as long as I can remember at
least, and while ugly and difficult to use are undeniably robust as they contain
years worth of tweaking and tuning for working on as many platforms in as many
situation as possible. The rationale behind this PR, however is:
* The makefiles are impenetrable to all but a few people on this
planet. This means that contributions to the build system are almost
nonexistent, and furthermore if a build system change is needed it's
incredibly difficult to figure out how to do so. This hindrance prevents us
from doing some "perhaps fancier" things we may wish to do in make.
* Our build system, while portable, is unfortunately not infinitely portable
everywhere. For example the recently-introduced MSVC target is quite unlikely
to have `make` installed by default (e.g. it requires building inside of an
MSYS2 shell currently). Conversely, the portability of make comes at a cost of
crazy and weird hacks to work around all sorts of versions of software
everywhere, especially when it comes to the configure script and makefiles.
By rewriting this logic in one of the most robust platforms there is, Rust,
we get to assuage all of these worries for free!
* There's a standard tool to build Rust crates, Cargo, but the standard library
and compiler don't use it. This means that they cannot benefit easily from the
crates.io ecosystem, nor can the ecosystem benefit from a standard way to
build this repository itself. Moving to Cargo should help assuage both of
these needs. This has the added benefit of making the compiler more
approachable for newbies as working on the compiler will just happen to be
working on a large Cargo project, all the same standard tools and tricks will
apply.
* There's a huge amount of portability information in the main distribution, for
example around cross compiling, compiling on new OSes, etc. Pushing this logic
into standard crates (like `gcc`) enables the community to immediately benefit
from new build logic.
Despite these benefits, it's going to be a long road to actually replace our
current build system. This PR is just the beginning and doesn't implement the
full suite of functionality as the current one, but there are many more to
follow! The current implementation strategy hopes to look like:
1. Land a second build system in-tree that can be itereated on an and
contributed to. This will not be used just yet in terms of gating new commits
to the repo.
2. Over time, bring the second build system to feature parity with the old build
system, start setting up CI for both build systems.
3. At some point in the future, switch the default to the new build system, but
keep the old one around.
4. At some further point in the future, delete the entire old build system.
---
Alright, so with all that out of the way, here's some more info on this PR
itself. The inital build system here is contained in the `src/bootstrap`
directory and just adds the necessary minimum bits to bootstrap the compiler
itself. There is currently no support for building documentation, running tests,
or installing, but the implemented support is:
* Compiling LLVM with `cmake` instead of `./configure` + `make`. The LLVM
project is removing their autotools build system, so we'd have to make this
transition eventually anyway.
* Compiling compiler-rt with `cmake` as well (for the same rationale as above).
* Adding `Cargo.toml` to map out the dependency graph to all crates, and also
adding `build.rs` files where appropriate. For example `alloc_jemalloc` has a
script to build jemalloc, `flate` has a script to build `miniz.c`, `std` will
build `libbacktrace`, etc.
* Orchestrating all the calls to `cargo` to build the standard distribution,
following the normal bootstrapping process. This also tracks dependencies
between steps to ensure cross-compilation targets happen as well.
* Configuration is intended to eventually be done through a `config.toml` file,
so support is implemented for this. The most likely vector of configuration
for now, however, is likely through `config.mk` (what `./configure` emits), so
the build system currently parses this information.
There's still quite a few steps left to do, and I'll open up some follow-up
issues (as well as a tracking issue) for this migration, but hopefully this is a
great start to get going! This PR is currently tested on all the
Windows/Linux/OSX triples for x86\_64 and x86, but more portability is always
welcome!
---
Future functionality left to implement
* [ ] Re-verify that multi-host builds work
* [ ] Verify android build works
* [ ] Verify iOS build work (mostly compiler-rt)
* [ ] Verify sha256 and ideally gpg of downloaded nightly compiler and nightly rustc
* [ ] Implement testing -- this is a huge bullet point with lots of sub-bullets
* [ ] Build and generate documentation (plus the various tools we have in-tree)
* [ ] Move various src/etc scripts into Rust -- not sure how this interacts with `make` build system
* [ ] Implement `make install` - like testing this is also quite massive
* [x] Deduplicate version information with makefiles
LLVM's memory dependence analysis doesn't properly account for calls
that could unwind and thus effectively act as a branching point. This
can lead to stores that are only visible when the call unwinds being
removed, possibly leading to calls to drop() functions with b0rked
memory contents.
As there is no fix for this in LLVM yet and we want to keep
compatibility to current LLVM versions anyways, we have to workaround
this bug by omitting the noalias attribute on &mut function arguments.
Benchmarks suggest that the performance loss by this change is very
small.
Thanks to @RalfJung for pushing me towards not removing too many
noalias annotations and @alexcrichton for helping out with the test for
this bug.
Fixes#29485
The pass removes the unwind branch of each terminator, thus moving the responsibility of handling
the -Z no-landing-pads flag to a small self-contained pass… instead of polluting the translator.
r? @Manishearth
I just noticed they can't be rolled up (often modifying the same line(s) in imports). So once I reach the critical amount for them to be merged I'll create a PR that merges all of them.
