Revert let_chains stabilization
This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
Bumps the stage0 compiler which already has it reverted.
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access
Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks
independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field
directly.
Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access,
which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
Suggest alternatives when trying to mutate a `HashMap`/`BTreeMap` via indexing
The error can be quite confusing to newcomers.
Fixes#100873.
I'm not so sure about the message, open to wording suggestions.
some general mir typeck cleanup
this pr contains the parts of #95763 which already work correctly.
the remaining commits of that PR have some issues which are more complex to fix.
r? types
Mention `as_mut` alongside `as_ref` in borrowck error message
Kinda fixes#99426 but I guess that really might be better staying open to see if we could make it suggest `as_mut` in a structured way. Not sure how to change borrowck to know that info tho.
Enable unused_parens for match arms
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92751
Currently I can't get the `stderr` to work with `./x.py test`, but this should fix the issue. Help would be appreciated!
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #98771 (Add support for link-flavor rust-lld for iOS, tvOS and watchOS)
- #98835 (relate `closure_substs.parent_substs()` to parent fn in NLL)
- #99746 (Use `TraitEngine` in more places that don't specifically need `FulfillmentContext::new_in_snapshot`)
- #99786 (Recover from C++ style `enum struct`)
- #99795 (Delay a bug when failed to normalize trait ref during specialization)
- #100029 (Prevent ICE for `doc_alias` on match arm, statement, expression)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Check that RPITs constrained by a recursive call in a closure are compatible
Fixes#99073
Adapts a similar visitor pattern to `find_opaque_ty_constraints` (that we use to check TAITs), but with some changes:
0. Only walk the "OnlyBody" children, instead of all items in the RPIT's defining scope
1. Only walk through the body's children if we found a constraining usage
2. Don't actually do any inference, just do a comparison and error if they're mismatched
----
r? `@oli-obk` -- you know all this impl-trait stuff best... is this the right approach? I can explain the underlying issue better if you'd like, in case that might reveal a better solution. Not sure if it's possible to gather up the closure's defining usages of the RPIT while borrowck'ing the outer function, that might be a better place to put this check...
