Improve error message for non-exhaustive matches on non-exhaustive enums
This pull request fixes#85227. For an enum marked with `#[non_exhaustive]` and not defined in the current crate, the error message for non-exhaustive matches now mentions the fact that the enum is marked as non-exhaustive:
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `_` not covered
--> main.rs:12:11
|
12 | match e {
| ^ pattern `_` not covered
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
= note: the matched value is of type `E`, which is marked as non-exhaustive
```
Store VariantIdx to distinguish enum variants
This saves ~24% of the instructions on the match-stress-enum benchmark, but I'm not 100% sure that this is OK - if we ever compare two constructors across enums (e.g., a Result and an Option), then this is obviously insufficient; I can experiment with continuing to store the DefId for comparison purposes in that case.
Add support for const operands and options to global_asm!
On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!.
Currently `global_asm!` only supports `const` operands and the `att_syntax` option. In the future, `sym` operands will also be supported. However there is no plan to support any of the other operand types or options since they don't make sense in the context of `global_asm!`.
r? `@nagisa`
have on_completion record subcycles
have on_completion record subcycles
Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).
This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:
* A depends on...
* B depends on A
* C depends on...
* D depends on C
* T: 'static
then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".
In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".
Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.
Fixes#83538
r? `@Aaron1011`
add BITS associated constant to core::num::Wrapping
This keeps `Wrapping` synchronized with the primitives it wraps as for the #32463 `wrapping_int_impl` feature.
Rustdoc cleanup
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83332. The goal of this PR is to remove a few unused things:
* The "loading content" things are now unneeded.
* Some toggle CSS rules were still there.
* Some parts of the JS had a different indent, fixed it.
r? `@jsha`
Fix diagnostic for cross crate private tuple struct constructors
Fixes#78708.
There was already some limited support for certain cross-crate scenarios but that didn't handle a tuple struct rexported from an inner module for example (e.g. the NonZero* types as seen in #85049).
```Rust
➜ cat bug.rs
fn main() {
let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
let n = std::num::NonZeroU32::new(1).unwrap();
match n {
std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
}
}
```
**Before:**
<details>
```Rust
➜ rustc +nightly bug.rs
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
--> bug.rs:2:14
|
2 | let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct literal syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0: val }`
|
::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: expected tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
--> bug.rs:5:9
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct pattern syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0 }`
|
::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>
**After:**
<details>
```Rust
➜ /rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc bug.rs
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> bug.rs:2:14
|
2 | let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
--> /rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: cannot match against a tuple struct which contains private fields
--> bug.rs:5:9
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
--> bug.rs:5:30
|
5 | std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
| ^ private field
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>
One question is if we should only collect the needed info for the cross-crate case after encountering an error instead of always doing it. Perf run perhaps to gauge the impact.
Remove rustc_args_required_const attribute
Now that stdarch no longer needs it (thanks `@Amanieu!),` we can kill the `rustc_args_required_const` attribute. This means that lifetime extension of references to temporaries is the only remaining job that promotion is performing. :-)
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69493
When having the order
```
foo.bar(); // we can now use this method since i32 implements the Foo trait
[...]
impl Foo for i32
```
the `// we can now use this method` comment is less clear to me.
Introduce the beginning of a THIR unsafety checker
This poses the foundations for the THIR unsafety checker, so that it can be implemented incrementally:
- implements a rudimentary `Visitor` for the THIR (which will definitely need some tweaking in the future)
- introduces a new `-Zthir-unsafeck` flag which tells the compiler to use THIR unsafeck instead of MIR unsafeck
- implements detection of unsafe functions
- adds revisions to the UI tests to test THIR unsafeck alongside MIR unsafeck
This uses a very simple query design, where bodies are unsafety-checked on a body per body basis. This however has some big flaws:
- the unsafety-checker builds the THIR itself, which means a lot of work is duplicated with MIR building constructing its own copy of the THIR
- unsafety-checking closures is currently completely wrong: closures should take into account the "safety context" in which they are created, here we are considering that closures are always a safe context
I had intended to fix these problems in follow-up PRs since they are always gated under the `-Zthir-unsafeck` flag (which is explicitely noted to be unsound).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/project-thir-unsafeck/issues/3https://github.com/rust-lang/project-thir-unsafeck/issues/7
Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).
This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:
* A depends on...
* B depends on A
* C depends on...
* D depends on C
* T: 'static
then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".
In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".
Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.
This attribute will cause us to invoke evaluate on every where clause of an
invoked function and to generate an error with the result.
Without this, it is very difficult to observe the effects of invoking the trait
evaluator.
Suggest adding a type parameter for impls
Add a new suggestion upon encountering an unknown type in a `impl` that suggests adding a new type parameter. This diagnostic suggests to add a new type parameter even though it may be a const parameter, however after adding the parameter and running rustc again a follow up error steers the user to change the type parameter to a const parameter.
```rust
struct X<const C: ()>();
impl X<C> {}
```
suggests
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `C` in this scope
--> bar.rs:2:8
|
1 | struct X<const C: ()>();
| ------------------------ similarly named struct `X` defined here
2 | impl X<C> {}
| ^
|
help: a struct with a similar name exists
|
2 | impl X<X> {}
| ^
help: you might be missing a type parameter
|
2 | impl<C> X<C> {}
| ^^^
```
After adding a type parameter the code now becomes
```rust
struct X<const C: ()>();
impl<C> X<C> {}
```
and the error now fully steers the user towards the correct code
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> bar.rs:2:11
|
2 | impl<C> X<C> {}
| ^
|
help: consider changing this type parameter to be a `const` generic
|
2 | impl<const C: ()> X<C> {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
r? `@estebank`
Somewhat related #84946
Add asm!() support for PowerPC
This includes GPRs and FPRs only.
Note that this does not include PowerPC64.
For my reference, this was mostly duplicated from PR #73214.
I ran into an error trying to fix dead block coverage and realized the
`coverageinfo` query is getting a different MIR compared to the
codegenned MIR, which can sometimes be a problem during mapgen.
I changed that query to use the `InstandeDef` (which includes the
generic parameter substitutions, prosibly specific to const params)
instead of the `DefId` (without unknown/default const substitutions).
Handle more span edge cases in generics diagnostics
This should fix invalid suggestions that didn't account for empty bracket pairs (`<>`) or type bindings.
Show macro name in 'this error originates in macro' message
When there are multiple macros in use, it can be difficult to tell
which one was responsible for producing an error.
#[inline(always)] on basic pointer methods
Retryng #85201 with only inlining pointer methods. The goal is to make pointers behave just like pointers in O0, mainly to reduce overhead in debug builds.
cc `@scottmcm`
Fixes#85197
We already preserved the `SyntaxContext` for invalid/dummy spans in the
incremental cache, but we weren't doing the same for crate metadata.
If an invalid (lo/hi from different files) span is written to the
incremental cache, we will decode it with a 'dummy' location, but keep
the original `SyntaxContext`. Since the crate metadata encoder was only
checking for `DUMMY_SP` (dummy location + root `SyntaxContext`),
the metadata encoder would treat it as a normal span, encoding the
`SyntaxContext`. As a result, the final span encoded to the metadata
would change across sessions, even if the crate itself was unchanged.
This PR updates our encoding of spans in the crate metadata to mirror
the encoding of spans into the incremental cache. We now always encode a
`SyntaxContext`, and encode location information for spans with a
non-dummy location.
