type-outlives works for closure types so that it ensures that all upvars
outlive the region in question. This gives the same guarantees but
without introducing artificial regions (and gives better error messages
to boot).
Two changes:
1. Make traits with assoc types invariant w/r/t their inputs.
2. Fully normalize parameter environments, including any region variables (which were being overlooked).
The former supports the latter, but also just seems like a reasonably good idea.
Fixes#21750
cc @edwardw
r? @pnkfelix
RFC 817 is not yet accepted, but I wanted to put this code up so people can see how it works. And to be ready lest it should be accepted.
cc rust-lang/rfcs#817
This is one more step towards completing #13231
This series of commits add support for default trait implementations. The changes in this PR don't break existing code and they are expected to preserve the existing behavior in the compiler as far as built-in bounds checks go.
The PR adds negative implementations of `Send`/`Sync` for some types and it removes the special cases for `Send`/`Sync` during the trait obligations checks. That is, it now fully relies on the traits check rather than lang items.
Once this patch lands and a new snapshot is created, it'll be possible to add default impls for `Send` and `Sync` and remove entirely the use of `BuiltinBound::{BoundSend,BoundSync}` for positive implementations as well.
This PR also removes the restriction on negative implementations. That is, it is now possible to add negative implementations for traits other than `Send`/`Sync`
- Don't allow multiple default trait implementations
- Allow positive trait implementations just for structs and enums when
there's a default implementation for such trait.
The big change here is that we update the object-safety rules to prohibit references to `Self` in the supertrait listing. See #22040 for the motivation. The other change is to handle the interaction of defaults that reference `Self` and object types (where `Self` is erased). We force users to give an explicit type in that scenario.
r? @aturon
Take 2. This PR includes a bunch of refactoring that was part of an experimental branch implementing [implied bounds]. That particular idea isn't ready to go yet, but the refactoring proved useful for fixing #22246. The implied bounds branch also exposed #22110 so a simple fix for that is included here. I still think some more refactoring would be a good idea here -- in particular I think most of the code in wf.rs is kind of duplicating the logic in implicator and should go, but I decided to post this PR and call it a day before diving into that. I'll write a bit more details about the solutions I adopted in the various bugs. I patched the two issues I was concerned about, which was the handling of supertraits and HRTB (the latter turned out to be fine, so I added a comment explaining why.)
r? @pnkfelix (for now, anyway)
cc @aturon
[implied bounds]: http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/07/06/implied-bounds/
This overlaps with #22276 (I left make check running overnight) but covers a number of additional cases and has a few rewrites where the clones are not even necessary.
This also implements `RandomAccessIterator` for `iter::Cloned`
cc @steveklabnik, you may want to glance at this before #22281 gets the bors treatment
into variance inference; fix various bugs in variance inference
so that it considers the correct set of constraints; modify infer to
consider the results of variance inference for type arguments.
