We used to apply it repeatedly as we went, relying on the current
value of the `region_bound_pairs_accum` vector. But now we save those
values into a map, so we can just process all the registered region
obligations at the end.
Error now correctly checks whether the borrow that does not live
long enough is being returned before annotating the error with the
arguments and return type from the signature - as this would not be
relevant if the borrow was not being returned.
Enhances annotation logic to properly consider named lifetimes where
lifetime elision rules that were previously implemented would not apply.
Further, adds new help and note messages to diagnostics and highlights
only lifetime when dealing with named lifetimes.
This error can only occur within a function when a borrow of data owned
within the function is returned; and when there are arguments that could
have been returned instead. Therefore, it is always applicable to add a
specific note that links to the relevant rust documentation about
dangling references.
Report when borrow could cause `&mut` aliasing during Drop
We were already issuing an error for the cases where this cropped up, so this is not fixing any soundness holes. The previous diagnostic just wasn't accurately describing the problem in the user's code.
Fix#52059
[NLL] Record more infomation on free region constraints in typeck
Changes:
* Makes the span of the MIR return place point to the return type
* Don't try to use a path to a type alias as a path to the adt it aliases (fixes an ICE)
* Don't claim that `self` is declared outside of the function. [see this test](f2995d5b1a (diff-0c9e6b1b204f42129b481df9ce459d44))
* Remove boring/interesting distinction and instead add a `ConstraintCategory` to the constraint.
* Add categories for implicit `Sized` and `Copy` requirements, for closure bounds, for user type annotations and `impl Trait`.
* Don't use the span of the first statement for Locations::All bounds (even if it happens to work on the tests we have)
Future work:
* Fine tuning the heuristic used to choose the place the report the error.
* Reporting multiple places (behind a flag)
* Better closure bounds reporting. This probably requires some discussion.
r? @nikomatsakis
Add UI test for deref recursion limit printing twice
Closes#38940
Does ``NOTE`` in the test need to be changed to ``HELP`` if its in the stderr?
``help: consider adding a `#![recursion_limit="20"]` attribute to your crate``
It doesn't appear to complaining locally that the line isn't set to ``HELP`` in the test, and the guide says
> HELP and SUGGESTION*
> * Note: SUGGESTION must follow immediately after HELP.
yet there's no concrete suggestion emitted.
r? @estebank
By introducing a new map that tracks the errors reported and the
`Place`s that spawned those errors against the move out that the error
was referring to, we are able to silence duplicate errors by emitting
only the error which corresponds to the most specific `Place` (that which
other `Place`s which reported errors are prefixes of).
This generally is an improvement, however there is a case -
`liveness-move-in-while` - where the output regresses.
Regression test for rust-lang/rust#53675.
(Includes a couple variations on the theme. I confirmed that the ones
in `in_expression_position` and `what_if_we_use_panic_directly_in_expr`
both failed back on "rustc 1.30.0-nightly (0f063aef6 2018-09-03)".)
Fix#53675
It is worth pointing out that the reason that so few diagnostics are
effected is because of the filter I put in where it only goes down the
new path if the borrowed place is *not* a prefix of the dropped place.
(Without that filter, a *lot* of the tests would need this change, and
it would probably be a net loss for the UX, since you'd see it even in
cases like borrows of generic types where there is no explicit mention
of `Drop`.)
use structured suggestion for "missing mut" label
Fixes#54133 for both NLL and non-NLL.
r? @estebank
I'm not super happy with the existing wording here, since it's now a suggestion. I wonder if the message would work better as something like "help: make binding mutable: `mut foo`"?
Also, are the `HELP` and `SUGGESTION` comments necessary?
(Includes a couple variations on the theme. I confirmed that the ones
in `in_expression_position` and `what_if_we_use_panic_directly_in_expr`
both failed back on "rustc 1.30.0-nightly (0f063aef6 2018-09-03)".)
resolve: Introduce two sub-namespaces in macro namespace
Two sub-namespaces are introduced in the macro namespace - one for bang macros and one for attribute-like macros (attributes, derives).
"Sub-namespace" means this is not a newly introduced full namespace, the single macro namespace is still in place.
I.e. you still can't define/import two macros with the same name in a single module, `use` imports still import only one name in macro namespace (from any sub-namespace) and not possibly two.
However, when we are searching for a name used in a `!` macro call context (`my_macro!()`) we skip attribute names in scope, and when we are searching for a name used in attribute context (`#[my_macro]`/`#[derive(my_macro)]`) we are skipping bang macro names in scope.
In other words, bang macros cannot shadow attribute macros and vice versa.
For a non-macro analogy, we could e.g. skip non-traits when searching for `MyTrait` in `impl MyTrait for Type { ... }`.
However we do not do it in non-macro namespaces because we don't have practical issues with e.g. non-traits shadowing traits with the same name, but with macros we do, especially after macro modularization.
For `#[test]` and `#[bench]` we have a hack in the compiler right now preventing their shadowing by `macro_rules! test` and similar things. This hack was introduced after making `#[test]`/`#[bench]` built-in macros instead of built-in attributes (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53410), something that needed to be done from the start since they are "active" attributes transforming their inputs.
Now they are passed through normal name resolution and can be shadowed, but that's a breaking change, so we have a special hack basically applying this PR for `#[test]` and `#[bench]` only.
Soon all potentially built-in attributes will be passed through normal name resolution (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53913) and that uncovers even more cases where the strict "macro namespace is a single namespace" rule needs to be broken.
For example, with strict rules, built-in macro `cfg!(...)` would shadow built-in attribute `#[cfg]` (they are different things), standard library macro `thread_local!(...)` would shadow built-in attribute `#[thread_local]` - both of these cases are covered by special hacks in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53913 as well.
Crater run uncovered more cases of attributes being shadowed by user-defined macros (`warn`, `doc`, `main`, even `deprecated`), we cannot add exceptions in the compiler for all of them.
Regressions with user-defined attributes like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53898 also appeared after enabling macro modularization.
People are also usually confused (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53205#issuecomment-411552763, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583#issuecomment-415447800) when they see conflicts between attributes and non-attribute macros for the first time.
So my proposed solution is to solve this issue by introducing two sub-namespaces and thus skipping resolutions of the wrong kind and preventing more error-causing cases of shadowing.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53583
[NLL] Suggest let binding
Closes#49821
Also adds an alternative to `explain_why_borrow_contains_point` that allows changing error messages based on the reason that will be given. This will also be useful for #51026, #51169 and maybe further changes to does not live long enough messages.
Rollup of 17 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53299 (Updated core/macros.rs to note it works in a no_std environment.)
- #53376 (Cross reference io::copy and fs::copy in docs.)
- #53455 (Individual docs for {from,to}_*_bytes)
- #53550 (librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing')
- #53860 (Migrate (some) of run-pass/ to ui)
- #53874 (Implement Unpin for Box, Rc, and Arc)
- #53895 (tidy: Cleanups and clippy warning fixes)
- #53946 (Clarify `ManuallyDrop` docs)
- #53948 (Minimized clippy test from when NLL disabled two-phase borrows)
- #53959 (Add .git extension to submodule paths missing it)
- #53966 (A few cleanups and minor improvements to mir/dataflow)
- #53967 (propagate build.python into cmake)
- #53979 (Remove `#[repr(transparent)]` from atomics)
- #53991 (Add unchecked_shl/shr check for intrinsics to fix miri's test suit)
- #53992 (migrate run-pass/borrowck to ui/run-pass)
- #53994 (migrate run-pass/*/ to ui/run-pass)
- #54023 (update clippy submodule)
librustc_lint: In recursion warning, change 'recurring' to 'recursing'
The existing wording seems incorrect.
Aside: This warning, 'function cannot return without recursing' is not perfectly clear - it implies that the function _can_ return, it's just got to recurse. But really the fn cannot return period. Clearer wording: 'function recurses infinitely; it cannot return'; or 'function is infinitely self-recursive; it cannot return, and this is probably an error'. I like that.
