Few visitors used the context passing feature and it can be easily emulated.
The added lifetime threading allows a visitor to keep safe references to AST
nodes it visits, making a non-owning ast_map design possible, for #13316.
`Box<[T]>` is created by allocating `Box<[T, ..n]>` and coercing it so
this code path is never used. It's also broken because it clamps the
capacity of the memory allocations to 4 elements and that's incompatible
with sized deallocation. This dates back to when `~[T]` was a growable
vector type implemented as:
*{ { tydesc, ref_count, prev, next }, { length, capacity, data[] } }
Since even empty vectors had to allocate, it started off the capacity of
all vectors at 4 as a heuristic. It's not possible to grow `Box<[T]>`
and there is no need for a memory allocation when it's empty, so it
would be a terrible heuristic today even if it worked.
When checking for an existing crate, compare against the
`crate_metadata::name` field, which is the crate name which
was requested during resolution, rather than the result of the
`crate_metadata::name()` method, which is the crate name within
the crate metadata, as these may not match when using the --extern
option to `rustc`.
This fixes spurious "multiple crate version" warnings under the
following scenario:
- The crate `foo`, is referenced multiple times
- `--extern foo=./path/to/libbar.rlib` is specified to rustc
- The internal crate name of `libbar.rlib` is not `foo`
The behavior surrounding `Context::should_match_name` and the
comments in `loader.rs` both lead me to believe that this scenario
is intended to work.
Fixes#17186
The Guide isn't 100% perfect, but it's basically complete. It's
certainly better than the tutorial is. Time to start pointing more
people its way.
I also just made it consistent to call all things 'guides' rather than
tutorials.
Fixes#9874. This is the big one.
And two bugs that just go away.
Fixes#14503.
Fixes#15009.
The Guide isn't 100% perfect, but it's basically complete. It's
certainly better than the tutorial is. Time to start pointing more
people its way.
I also just made it consistent to call all things 'guides' rather than
tutorials.
Fixes#9874. This is the big one.
And two bugs that just go away.
Fixes#14503.
Fixes#15009.
gcc, ld, ar, dlltool, windres go into $(RUST)/bin/rustlib/<triple>/bin/
platform libraries and startup objects got into $(RUST)/bin/rustlib/<triple>/lib/
Avoid ever constructing cyclic types in the first place, rather than detecting them in resolve. This simplifies logic elsewhere in the compiler, in particular on the trait reform branch.
r? @pnkfelix or @pcwalton
cc #5527
Bugs in pdflatex (#12804) are preventing the guide from landing (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/16657). This solves the immediate problem by changing the build system to prefer lualatex, xelatex to pdflatex (which is apparently obsolete). Because the xelatex on the snapshot bot seems to completely ignore the `-output-directory` option, I also had to frob the makefiles a bit for that case.
The pointer in the slice must not be null, because enum representations
make that assumption. The `exchange_malloc` function returns a non-null
sentinel for the zero size case, and it must not be passed to the
`exchange_free` lang item.
Since the length is always equal to the true capacity, a branch on the
length is enough for most types. Slices of zero size types are
statically special cased to never attempt deallocation. This is the same
implementation as `Vec<T>`.
Closes#14395
The spans inside of these types were always None and never used. Pass
the expander function directly instead of wrapping it in one of these
types.
[breaking-change]
This allows code to access the fields of tuples and tuple structs behind the feature gate `tuple_indexing`:
```rust
#![feature(tuple_indexing)]
let x = (1i, 2i);
assert_eq!(x.1, 2);
struct Point(int, int);
let origin = Point(0, 0);
assert_eq!(origin.0, 0);
assert_eq!(origin.1, 0);
```
Implements [RFC 53](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/active/0053-tuple-accessors.md). Closes#16950.
This part can get _really_ confusing, and we want to make sure that
people succeed in the guide. I plan on making a module guide in the
future to replace the information here.
This builds on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/17109, putting the target triple into the installer name so that we can have both 32-bit and 64-bit.
The resulting installers will be called `rust-0.12.0-pre-x86_64-w64-mingw32.exe`, etc.
This adds links to SO, reddit, and discuss to the README. The main intent is to start advertising discuss.rust-lang.org more, in a location that doesn't mislead casual users to it (people who are building Rust are more likely to be the right audience than those that are just visiting the web site).
