mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add note about x86 instruction prefixes in asm!

Browse Source 
Since rustc doesn't do the assembly parsing itself, it is unable
to detect when inline assembly ends with an instruction prefix,
which doesn't make sense since it would apply to instructions from
the compiler. This fixes #82314 by mentioning that x86 instruction
prefixes must not be used in inline assembly.
This commit is contained in:
Smittyvb 2021-11-03 09:24:50 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3831aaa13c
commit fdb6bdacfa
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/doc/unstable-book/src/library-features/asm.md
View File

@ -885,5 +885,7 @@ The compiler performs some additional checks on options:
- You are responsible for switching any target-specific state (e.g. thread-local storage, stack bounds).
- The set of memory locations that you may access is the intersection of those allowed by the `asm!` blocks you entered and exited.
- You cannot assume that an `asm!` block will appear exactly once in the output binary. The compiler is allowed to instantiate multiple copies of the `asm!` block, for example when the function containing it is inlined in multiple places.
- On x86, inline assembly must not end with an instruction prefix (such as `LOCK`) that would apply to instructions generated by the compiler.
- The compiler is currently unable to detect this due to the way inline assembly is compiled.
> **Note**: As a general rule, the flags covered by `preserves_flags` are those which are *not* preserved when performing a function call.