Make Module impl methods crate-private, update some comments

This commit is contained in:
Florian Diebold 2019-01-13 11:58:41 +01:00
parent 5862542ded
commit fa7f9d696f
3 changed files with 23 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ impl Module {
}
/// Finds a child module with the specified name.
pub fn child_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase, name: &Name) -> Option<Module> {
pub(crate) fn child_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase, name: &Name) -> Option<Module> {
let loc = self.def_id.loc(db);
let module_tree = db.module_tree(loc.source_root_id);
let child_id = loc.module_id.child(&module_tree, name)?;
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ impl Module {
}
/// Iterates over all child modules.
pub fn children_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> impl Iterator<Item = Module> {
pub(crate) fn children_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> impl Iterator<Item = Module> {
// FIXME this should be implementable without collecting into a vec, but
// it's kind of hard since the iterator needs to keep a reference to the
// module tree.
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ impl Module {
children.into_iter()
}
pub fn parent_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> Option<Module> {
pub(crate) fn parent_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> Option<Module> {
let loc = self.def_id.loc(db);
let module_tree = db.module_tree(loc.source_root_id);
let parent_id = loc.module_id.parent(&module_tree)?;
@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ impl Module {
}
/// Returns a `ModuleScope`: a set of items, visible in this module.
pub fn scope_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> ModuleScope {
pub(crate) fn scope_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> ModuleScope {
let loc = self.def_id.loc(db);
let item_map = db.item_map(loc.source_root_id);
item_map.per_module[&loc.module_id].clone()
}
pub fn resolve_path_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase, path: &Path) -> PerNs<DefId> {
pub(crate) fn resolve_path_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase, path: &Path) -> PerNs<DefId> {
let mut curr_per_ns = PerNs::types(
match path.kind {
PathKind::Crate => self.crate_root(db),
@ -191,7 +191,10 @@ impl Module {
curr_per_ns
}
pub fn problems_impl(&self, db: &impl HirDatabase) -> Vec<(TreeArc<SyntaxNode>, Problem)> {
pub(crate) fn problems_impl(
&self,
db: &impl HirDatabase,
) -> Vec<(TreeArc<SyntaxNode>, Problem)> {
let loc = self.def_id.loc(db);
let module_tree = db.module_tree(loc.source_root_id);
loc.module_id.problems(&module_tree, db)

View File

@ -151,6 +151,15 @@ pub(crate) enum DefKind {
Type,
Item,
/// The constructor of a struct. E.g. if we have `struct Foo(usize)`, the
/// name `Foo` needs to resolve to different types depending on whether we
/// are in the types or values namespace: As a type, `Foo` of course refers
/// to the struct `Foo`; as a value, `Foo` is a callable type with signature
/// `(usize) -> Foo`. The cleanest approach to handle this seems to be to
/// have different defs in the two namespaces.
///
/// rustc does the same; note that it even creates a struct constructor if
/// the struct isn't a tuple struct (see `CtorKind::Fictive` in rustc).
StructCtor,
}

View File

@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ pub enum Ty {
// Opaque(DefId, Substs),
/// A type parameter; for example, `T` in `fn f<T>(x: T) {}
Param {
/// The index of the parameter.
/// The index of the parameter (starting with parameters from the
/// surrounding impl, then the current function).
idx: u32,
/// The name of the parameter, for displaying.
name: Name,
@ -440,7 +441,9 @@ impl Ty {
if (idx as usize) < substs.0.len() {
substs.0[idx as usize].clone()
} else {
// TODO it's yet unclear to me whether we need to shift the indices here
// TODO: does this indicate a bug? i.e. should we always
// have substs for all type params? (they might contain the
// params themselves again...)
Ty::Param { idx, name }
}
}