Rollup merge of #126719 - nnethercote:fix-126521, r=oli-obk
Fix assertion failure for some `Expect` diagnostics. In #120699 I moved some code dealing with `has_future_breakage` earlier in `emit_diagnostic`. Issue #126521 identified a case where that reordering was invalid (leading to an assertion failure) for some `Expect` diagnostics. This commit partially undoes the change, by moving the handling of unstable `Expect` diagnostics earlier again. This makes `emit_diagnostic` a bit uglier, but is necessary to fix the problem. Fixes #126521. r? ``@oli-obk``
This commit is contained in:
commit
f511f2b18d
@ -1437,6 +1437,24 @@ fn emit_stashed_diagnostics(&mut self) -> Option<ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
|
||||
// Return value is only `Some` if the level is `Error` or `DelayedBug`.
|
||||
fn emit_diagnostic(&mut self, mut diagnostic: DiagInner) -> Option<ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
match diagnostic.level {
|
||||
Expect(expect_id) | ForceWarning(Some(expect_id)) => {
|
||||
// The `LintExpectationId` can be stable or unstable depending on when it was
|
||||
// created. Diagnostics created before the definition of `HirId`s are unstable and
|
||||
// can not yet be stored. Instead, they are buffered until the `LintExpectationId`
|
||||
// is replaced by a stable one by the `LintLevelsBuilder`.
|
||||
if let LintExpectationId::Unstable { .. } = expect_id {
|
||||
// We don't call TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC because we wait for the
|
||||
// unstable ID to be updated, whereupon the diagnostic will be
|
||||
// passed into this method again.
|
||||
self.unstable_expect_diagnostics.push(diagnostic);
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Continue through to the `Expect`/`ForceWarning` case below.
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if diagnostic.has_future_breakage() {
|
||||
// Future breakages aren't emitted if they're `Level::Allow`,
|
||||
// but they still need to be constructed and stashed below,
|
||||
@ -1512,16 +1530,8 @@ fn emit_diagnostic(&mut self, mut diagnostic: DiagInner) -> Option<ErrorGuarante
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Expect(expect_id) | ForceWarning(Some(expect_id)) => {
|
||||
// Diagnostics created before the definition of `HirId`s are
|
||||
// unstable and can not yet be stored. Instead, they are
|
||||
// buffered until the `LintExpectationId` is replaced by a
|
||||
// stable one by the `LintLevelsBuilder`.
|
||||
if let LintExpectationId::Unstable { .. } = expect_id {
|
||||
// We don't call TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC because we wait for the
|
||||
// unstable ID to be updated, whereupon the diagnostic will
|
||||
// be passed into this method again.
|
||||
self.unstable_expect_diagnostics.push(diagnostic);
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
unreachable!(); // this case was handled at the top of this function
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.fulfilled_expectations.insert(expect_id.normalize());
|
||||
if let Expect(_) = diagnostic.level {
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
|
||||
//@ known-bug: rust-lang/rust#126521
|
||||
macro_rules! foo {
|
||||
($val:ident) => {
|
||||
true;
|
||||
@ -7,5 +6,6 @@ macro_rules! foo {
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
#[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||
//~^ ERROR the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||
let _ = foo!(x);
|
||||
}
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
error[E0658]: the `#[expect]` attribute is an experimental feature
|
||||
--> $DIR/expect-future_breakage-crash-issue-126521.rs:8:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | #[expect(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: see issue #54503 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54503> for more information
|
||||
= help: add `#![feature(lint_reasons)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
||||
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user