Address review comments
Reword the lead paragraph and turn the list items into complete sentences.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0df0ae734
commit
f3fdbbfae8
@ -12,8 +12,9 @@
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## The need for synchronization
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! On an ideal single-core CPU, the timeline of events happening in a program
|
||||
//! is linear, consistent with the order of operations in the code.
|
||||
//! Conceptually, a Rust program is simply a series of operations which will
|
||||
//! be executed on a computer. The timeline of events happening in the program
|
||||
//! is consistent with the order of the operations in the code.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Considering the following code, operating on some global static variables:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
@ -35,22 +36,22 @@
|
||||
//! ```
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! It appears _as if_ some variables stored in memory are changed, an addition
|
||||
//! is performed, result is stored in A and the variable C is modified twice.
|
||||
//! is performed, result is stored in `A` and the variable `C` is modified twice.
|
||||
//! When only a single thread is involved, the results are as expected:
|
||||
//! the line `7 4 4` gets printed.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! As for what happens behind the scenes, when an optimizing compiler is used
|
||||
//! the final generated machine code might look very different from the code:
|
||||
//! As for what happens behind the scenes, when optimizations are enabled the
|
||||
//! final generated machine code might look very different from the code:
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - first store to `C` might be moved before the store to `A` or `B`,
|
||||
//! _as if_ we had written `C = 4; A = 3; B = 4;`
|
||||
//! - The first store to `C` might be moved before the store to `A` or `B`,
|
||||
//! _as if_ we had written `C = 4; A = 3; B = 4`.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - assignment of `A + B` to `A` might be removed, the sum can be stored in a
|
||||
//! in a register until it gets printed, and the global variable never gets
|
||||
//! updated.
|
||||
//! - Assignment of `A + B` to `A` might be removed, since the sum can be stored
|
||||
//! in a temporary location until it gets printed, with the global variable
|
||||
//! never getting updated.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - the final result could be determined just by looking at the code at compile time,
|
||||
//! so [constant folding] might turn the whole block into a simple `println!("7 4 4")`
|
||||
//! - The final result could be determined just by looking at the code at compile time,
|
||||
//! so [constant folding] might turn the whole block into a simple `println!("7 4 4")`.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The compiler is allowed to perform any combination of these optimizations, as long
|
||||
//! as the final optimized code, when executed, produces the same results as the one
|
||||
@ -77,8 +78,8 @@
|
||||
//! might hoist memory loads at the top of a code block, so that the CPU can
|
||||
//! start [prefetching] the values from memory.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! In single-threaded scenarios, this can cause issues when writing signal handlers
|
||||
//! or certain kinds of low-level code.
|
||||
//! In single-threaded scenarios, this can cause issues when writing
|
||||
//! signal handlers or certain kinds of low-level code.
|
||||
//! Use [compiler fences] to prevent this reordering.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - **Single processor** executing instructions [out-of-order]: modern CPUs are
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user