fixup! docs: Improve AsRef / AsMut docs on blanket impls
Changed wording in sections on "Reflexivity": replaced "that is there is" with "i.e. there would be" and removed comma before "with" Reason: "there is" somewhat contradicted the "would be" hypothetical. A slightly redundant wording has now been chosen for better clarity. The comma seemed to be superfluous.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4a259b5e4
commit
e6b761b902
@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ pub const fn identity<T>(x: T) -> T {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Reflexivity
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Ideally, `AsRef` would be reflexive, that is there is an `impl<T: ?Sized> AsRef<T> for T`, with
|
||||
/// [`as_ref`] simply returning its argument unchanged.
|
||||
/// Ideally, `AsRef` would be reflexive, i.e. there would be an `impl<T: ?Sized> AsRef<T> for T`
|
||||
/// with [`as_ref`] simply returning its argument unchanged.
|
||||
/// Such a blanket implementation is currently *not* provided due to technical restrictions of
|
||||
/// Rust's type system (it would be overlapping with another existing blanket implementation for
|
||||
/// `&T where T: AsRef<U>` which allows `AsRef` to auto-dereference, see "Generic Implementations"
|
||||
@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ pub trait AsRef<T: ?Sized> {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Reflexivity
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Ideally, `AsMut` would be reflexive, that is there is an `impl<T: ?Sized> AsMut<T> for T`, with
|
||||
/// [`as_mut`] simply returning its argument unchanged.
|
||||
/// Ideally, `AsMut` would be reflexive, i.e. there would be an `impl<T: ?Sized> AsMut<T> for T`
|
||||
/// with [`as_mut`] simply returning its argument unchanged.
|
||||
/// Such a blanket implementation is currently *not* provided due to technical restrictions of
|
||||
/// Rust's type system (it would be overlapping with another existing blanket implementation for
|
||||
/// `&mut T where T: AsMut<U>` which allows `AsMut` to auto-dereference, see "Generic
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user