Rollup merge of #128380 - folkertdev:naked-compatible-doc-comment, r=bjorn3

make `///` doc comments compatible with naked functions

tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957

reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127853#issuecomment-2257323333

it turns out `/// doc comment` and `#[doc = "doc comment"]` are represented differently, at least at the point where we perform the check for what should be allowed. The `///` style doc comment is now also allowed.

r? ``@bjorn3``

cc ``@hsanzg``

compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

@@ -461,6 +461,12 @@ impl<'tcx> CheckAttrVisitor<'tcx> {
             Target::Fn
             | Target::Method(MethodKind::Trait { body: true } | MethodKind::Inherent) => {
                 for other_attr in attrs {
+                    // this covers "sugared doc comments" of the form `/// ...`
+                    // it does not cover `#[doc = "..."]`, which is handled below
+                    if other_attr.is_doc_comment() {
+                        continue;
+                    }
+
                     if !ALLOW_LIST.iter().any(|name| other_attr.has_name(*name)) {
                         self.dcx().emit_err(errors::NakedFunctionIncompatibleAttribute {
                             span: other_attr.span,

tests/ui/asm/naked-functions.rs

@@ -239,6 +239,9 @@ pub unsafe extern "C" fn compatible_target_feature() {
 }
 
 #[doc = "foo bar baz"]
+/// a doc comment
+// a normal comment
+#[doc(alias = "ADocAlias")]
 #[naked]
 pub unsafe extern "C" fn compatible_doc_attributes() {
     asm!("", options(noreturn, raw));