Rollup merge of #115633 - compiler-errors:PRIVATE_BOUNDS-lint-node, r=petrochenkov
Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type The HIR that the `PRIVATE_BOUNDS` lint should be attached to is the item that has the *bounds*, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with the `EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES` lint, which also requires putting the `allow` on the item that names the private type. Fixes #115475 r? petrochenkov
This commit is contained in:
commit
e3b6122530
@ -1463,14 +1463,15 @@ fn check_def_id(&mut self, def_id: DefId, kind: &str, descr: &dyn fmt::Display)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let vis = self.tcx.local_visibility(local_def_id);
|
||||
let hir_id = self.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id);
|
||||
let span = self.tcx.def_span(self.item_def_id.to_def_id());
|
||||
let vis_span = self.tcx.def_span(def_id);
|
||||
if self.in_assoc_ty && !vis.is_at_least(self.required_visibility, self.tcx) {
|
||||
let vis_descr = match vis {
|
||||
ty::Visibility::Public => "public",
|
||||
ty::Visibility::Restricted(vis_def_id) => {
|
||||
if vis_def_id == self.tcx.parent_module(hir_id).to_local_def_id() {
|
||||
if vis_def_id
|
||||
== self.tcx.parent_module_from_def_id(local_def_id).to_local_def_id()
|
||||
{
|
||||
"private"
|
||||
} else if vis_def_id.is_top_level_module() {
|
||||
"crate-private"
|
||||
@ -1504,7 +1505,7 @@ fn check_def_id(&mut self, def_id: DefId, kind: &str, descr: &dyn fmt::Display)
|
||||
};
|
||||
self.tcx.emit_spanned_lint(
|
||||
lint,
|
||||
hir_id,
|
||||
self.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(self.item_def_id),
|
||||
span,
|
||||
PrivateInterfacesOrBoundsLint {
|
||||
item_span: span,
|
||||
|
7
tests/ui/privacy/private-bounds-locally-allowed.rs
Normal file
7
tests/ui/privacy/private-bounds-locally-allowed.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
// check-pass
|
||||
// compile-flags: --crate-type=lib
|
||||
|
||||
#[allow(private_bounds)]
|
||||
pub trait Foo: FooImpl {}
|
||||
|
||||
trait FooImpl {}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user