Use correct search scopes for macros
This commit is contained in:
parent
48f84a7b60
commit
e2ede38d47
@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
|
||||
use rustc_hash::FxHashSet;
|
||||
use syntax::{
|
||||
ast::{self, LoopBodyOwner},
|
||||
match_ast, AstNode, SyntaxNode, SyntaxToken, TextRange, TextSize, T,
|
||||
match_ast, AstNode,
|
||||
SyntaxKind::IDENT,
|
||||
SyntaxNode, SyntaxToken, TextRange, TextSize, T,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::{display::TryToNav, references, NavigationTarget};
|
||||
@ -46,9 +48,10 @@ pub(crate) fn highlight_related(
|
||||
let syntax = sema.parse(position.file_id).syntax().clone();
|
||||
|
||||
let token = pick_best_token(syntax.token_at_offset(position.offset), |kind| match kind {
|
||||
T![?] => 3, // prefer `?` when the cursor is sandwiched like in `await$0?`
|
||||
T![->] => 2,
|
||||
kind if kind.is_keyword() => 1,
|
||||
T![?] => 4, // prefer `?` when the cursor is sandwiched like in `await$0?`
|
||||
T![->] => 3,
|
||||
kind if kind.is_keyword() => 2,
|
||||
IDENT => 1,
|
||||
_ => 0,
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ fn highlight_references(
|
||||
let defs = find_defs(sema, syntax, offset);
|
||||
let usages = defs
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.flat_map(|&d| {
|
||||
.filter_map(|&d| {
|
||||
d.usages(sema)
|
||||
.set_scope(Some(SearchScope::single_file(file_id)))
|
||||
.include_self_refs()
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ pub enum ReferenceAccess {
|
||||
/// For `pub(crate)` things it's a crate, for `pub` things it's a crate and dependant crates.
|
||||
/// In some cases, the location of the references is known to within a `TextRange`,
|
||||
/// e.g. for things like local variables.
|
||||
#[derive(Clone)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct SearchScope {
|
||||
entries: FxHashMap<FileId, Option<TextRange>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -216,6 +216,14 @@ fn search_scope(&self, db: &RootDatabase) -> SearchScope {
|
||||
return SearchScope::crate_graph(db);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// def is crate root
|
||||
// FIXME: We don't do searches for crates currently, as a crate does not actually have a single name
|
||||
if let &Definition::ModuleDef(hir::ModuleDef::Module(module)) = self {
|
||||
if module.crate_root(db) == module {
|
||||
return SearchScope::reverse_dependencies(db, module.krate());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let module = match self.module(db) {
|
||||
Some(it) => it,
|
||||
None => return SearchScope::empty(),
|
||||
@ -273,13 +281,22 @@ fn search_scope(&self, db: &RootDatabase) -> SearchScope {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let Definition::Macro(macro_def) = self {
|
||||
if macro_def.kind() == hir::MacroKind::Declarative {
|
||||
return if macro_def.attrs(db).by_key("macro_export").exists() {
|
||||
return match macro_def.kind() {
|
||||
hir::MacroKind::Declarative => {
|
||||
if macro_def.attrs(db).by_key("macro_export").exists() {
|
||||
SearchScope::reverse_dependencies(db, module.krate())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
SearchScope::krate(db, module.krate())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
hir::MacroKind::BuiltIn => SearchScope::crate_graph(db),
|
||||
// FIXME: We don't actually see derives in derive attributes as these do not
|
||||
// expand to something that references the derive macro in the output.
|
||||
// We could get around this by emitting dummy `use DeriveMacroPathHere as _;` items maybe?
|
||||
hir::MacroKind::Derive | hir::MacroKind::Attr | hir::MacroKind::ProcMacro => {
|
||||
SearchScope::reverse_dependencies(db, module.krate())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
SearchScope::krate(db, module.krate())
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let vis = self.visibility(db);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user