Rollup merge of #90082 - noncombatant:patch-1, r=GuillaumeGomez
Fix minor typos
This commit is contained in:
commit
dbe7141ac0
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ assert_eq!(x, 5);
|
||||
This will write the value `5` into the `u64` variable `x`.
|
||||
You can see that the string literal we use to specify instructions is actually a template string.
|
||||
It is governed by the same rules as Rust [format strings][format-syntax].
|
||||
The arguments that are inserted into the template however look a bit different then you may
|
||||
The arguments that are inserted into the template however look a bit different than you may
|
||||
be familiar with. First we need to specify if the variable is an input or an output of the
|
||||
inline assembly. In this case it is an output. We declared this by writing `out`.
|
||||
We also need to specify in what kind of register the assembly expects the variable.
|
||||
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ code.
|
||||
Second, we can see that inputs are declared by writing `in` instead of `out`.
|
||||
|
||||
Third, one of our operands has a type we haven't seen yet, `const`.
|
||||
This tells the compiler to expand this argument to value directly inside the assembly template.
|
||||
This tells the compiler to expand this argument to a value directly inside the assembly template.
|
||||
This is only possible for constants and literals.
|
||||
|
||||
Fourth, we can see that we can specify an argument number, or name as in any format string.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user