Use if-let instead of match with guard
This commit is contained in:
parent
6c00e54667
commit
d9ddaf0d6f
@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKi
|
|||||||
use rustc_infer::infer::InferOk;
|
use rustc_infer::infer::InferOk;
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::middle::stability;
|
use rustc_middle::middle::stability;
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::{Adjust, Adjustment, AllowTwoPhase};
|
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::{Adjust, Adjustment, AllowTwoPhase};
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::ty::error::ExpectedFound;
|
use rustc_middle::ty::error::TypeError::FieldMisMatch;
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::ty::error::TypeError::{FieldMisMatch, Sorts};
|
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
|
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
|
||||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtKind, DefIdTree, Ty, TypeFoldable};
|
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtKind, DefIdTree, Ty, TypeFoldable};
|
||||||
use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
|
use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
|
||||||
@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
&self,
|
&self,
|
||||||
expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
|
expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
|
||||||
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
|
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||||
extend_err: impl Fn(&mut Diagnostic),
|
extend_err: impl FnMut(&mut Diagnostic),
|
||||||
) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
||||||
self.check_expr_meets_expectation_or_error(expr, ExpectHasType(expected), extend_err)
|
self.check_expr_meets_expectation_or_error(expr, ExpectHasType(expected), extend_err)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
&self,
|
&self,
|
||||||
expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
|
expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
|
||||||
expected: Expectation<'tcx>,
|
expected: Expectation<'tcx>,
|
||||||
extend_err: impl Fn(&mut Diagnostic),
|
mut extend_err: impl FnMut(&mut Diagnostic),
|
||||||
) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
||||||
let expected_ty = expected.to_option(&self).unwrap_or(self.tcx.types.bool);
|
let expected_ty = expected.to_option(&self).unwrap_or(self.tcx.types.bool);
|
||||||
let mut ty = self.check_expr_with_expectation(expr, expected);
|
let mut ty = self.check_expr_with_expectation(expr, expected);
|
||||||
@ -1557,8 +1556,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
// FIXME: We are currently creating two branches here in order to maintain
|
// FIXME: We are currently creating two branches here in order to maintain
|
||||||
// consistency. But they should be merged as much as possible.
|
// consistency. But they should be merged as much as possible.
|
||||||
let fru_tys = if self.tcx.features().type_changing_struct_update {
|
let fru_tys = if self.tcx.features().type_changing_struct_update {
|
||||||
match adt_ty.kind() {
|
if let ty::Adt(adt, substs) = adt_ty.kind() && adt.is_struct() {
|
||||||
ty::Adt(adt, substs) if adt.is_struct() => {
|
|
||||||
// Make an ADT with fresh inference substitutions. This
|
// Make an ADT with fresh inference substitutions. This
|
||||||
// will allow us to guide inference along so that, e.g.
|
// will allow us to guide inference along so that, e.g.
|
||||||
// ```
|
// ```
|
||||||
@ -1572,21 +1570,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
// will allow us to then do a subtyping relation on all
|
// will allow us to then do a subtyping relation on all
|
||||||
// of the `remaining_fields` below, per the RFC.
|
// of the `remaining_fields` below, per the RFC.
|
||||||
let fresh_substs = self.fresh_substs_for_item(base_expr.span, adt.did());
|
let fresh_substs = self.fresh_substs_for_item(base_expr.span, adt.did());
|
||||||
|
let fresh_base_ty = self.tcx.mk_adt(*adt, fresh_substs);
|
||||||
let base_ty = self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(
|
let base_ty = self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(
|
||||||
base_expr,
|
base_expr,
|
||||||
self.tcx.mk_adt(*adt, fresh_substs),
|
fresh_base_ty,
|
||||||
|_| {},
|
|_| {
|
||||||
|
error_happened = true;
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
let base_ty = self.shallow_resolve(base_ty);
|
let base_ty = self.shallow_resolve(base_ty);
|
||||||
match base_ty.kind() {
|
if let ty::Adt(base_adt, base_substs) = base_ty.kind() && adt == base_adt {
|
||||||
ty::Adt(base_adt, base_subs) if adt == base_adt => {
|
|
||||||
variant
|
variant
|
||||||
.fields
|
.fields
|
||||||
.iter()
|
.iter()
|
||||||
.map(|f| {
|
.map(|f| {
|
||||||
let fru_ty = self.normalize_associated_types_in(
|
let fru_ty = self.normalize_associated_types_in(
|
||||||
expr_span,
|
expr_span,
|
||||||
self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, base_subs),
|
self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, base_substs),
|
||||||
);
|
);
|
||||||
let ident = self
|
let ident = self
|
||||||
.tcx
|
.tcx
|
||||||
@ -1603,8 +1603,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
self.register_predicates(obligations)
|
self.register_predicates(obligations)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
// FIXME: Need better diagnostics for `FieldMisMatch` error
|
// FIXME: Need better diagnostics for `FieldMisMatch` error
|
||||||
Err(type_error) => {
|
Err(_) => {
|
||||||
debug!("check_expr_struct_fields: {fru_ty} sub {target_ty} failed: {type_error:?}");
|
|
||||||
self.report_mismatched_types(
|
self.report_mismatched_types(
|
||||||
&cause,
|
&cause,
|
||||||
target_ty,
|
target_ty,
|
||||||
@ -1618,20 +1617,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
self.resolve_vars_if_possible(fru_ty)
|
self.resolve_vars_if_possible(fru_ty)
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
.collect()
|
.collect()
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
if !error_happened && !base_ty.references_error() {
|
||||||
|
span_bug!(base_expr.span, "expected an error to have been reported in `check_expr_has_type_or_error`");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
_ => {
|
|
||||||
self.report_mismatched_types(
|
|
||||||
&self.misc(base_expr.span),
|
|
||||||
adt_ty,
|
|
||||||
base_ty,
|
|
||||||
Sorts(ExpectedFound::new(true, adt_ty, base_ty)),
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
.emit();
|
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
} else {
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
_ => {
|
|
||||||
// Check the base_expr, regardless of a bad expected adt_ty, so we can get
|
// Check the base_expr, regardless of a bad expected adt_ty, so we can get
|
||||||
// type errors on that expression, too.
|
// type errors on that expression, too.
|
||||||
self.check_expr(base_expr);
|
self.check_expr(base_expr);
|
||||||
@ -1640,7 +1632,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
|
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {
|
self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {
|
||||||
let base_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().expr_ty(*base_expr);
|
let base_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().expr_ty(*base_expr);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user