Stabilize min_exhaustive_patterns

compiler/rustc_feature/src/accepted.rs

@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ macro_rules! declare_features {
     (accepted, min_const_generics, "1.51.0", Some(74878)),
     /// Allows calling `const unsafe fn` inside `unsafe` blocks in `const fn` functions.
     (accepted, min_const_unsafe_fn, "1.33.0", Some(55607)),
+    /// Allows exhaustive pattern matching on uninhabited types when matched by value.
+    (accepted, min_exhaustive_patterns, "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION", Some(119612)),
     /// Allows using `Self` and associated types in struct expressions and patterns.
     (accepted, more_struct_aliases, "1.16.0", Some(37544)),
     /// Allows using the MOVBE target feature.

compiler/rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs

@@ -519,9 +519,6 @@ pub fn internal(&self, feature: Symbol) -> bool {
     (unstable, macro_metavar_expr_concat, "1.81.0", Some(124225)),
     /// Allows `#[marker]` on certain traits allowing overlapping implementations.
     (unstable, marker_trait_attr, "1.30.0", Some(29864)),
-    /// Allows exhaustive pattern matching on types that contain uninhabited types in cases that are
-    /// unambiguously sound.
-    (unstable, min_exhaustive_patterns, "1.77.0", Some(119612)),
     /// A minimal, sound subset of specialization intended to be used by the
     /// standard library until the soundness issues with specialization
     /// are fixed.

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/match_pair.rs

@@ -208,14 +208,11 @@ pub(in crate::build) fn for_pattern(
                 subpairs = cx.field_match_pairs(downcast_place, subpatterns);
 
                 let irrefutable = adt_def.variants().iter_enumerated().all(|(i, v)| {
-                    i == variant_index || {
-                        (cx.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
-                            || cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
-                            && !v
-                                .inhabited_predicate(cx.tcx, adt_def)
-                                .instantiate(cx.tcx, args)
-                                .apply_ignore_module(cx.tcx, cx.param_env)
-                    }
+                    i == variant_index
+                        || !v
+                            .inhabited_predicate(cx.tcx, adt_def)
+                            .instantiate(cx.tcx, args)
+                            .apply_ignore_module(cx.tcx, cx.param_env)
                 }) && (adt_def.did().is_local()
                     || !adt_def.is_variant_list_non_exhaustive());
                 if irrefutable {

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/check_match.rs

@@ -695,9 +695,7 @@ fn check_binding_is_irrefutable(
 
         // Emit an extra note if the first uncovered witness would be uninhabited
         // if we disregard visibility.
-        let witness_1_is_privately_uninhabited = if (self.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
-            || self.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
-            && let Some(witness_1) = witnesses.get(0)
+        let witness_1_is_privately_uninhabited = if let Some(witness_1) = witnesses.get(0)
             && let ty::Adt(adt, args) = witness_1.ty().kind()
             && adt.is_enum()
             && let Constructor::Variant(variant_index) = witness_1.ctor()
@@ -1059,7 +1057,7 @@ fn report_non_exhaustive_match<'p, 'tcx>(
                 err.note("`&str` cannot be matched exhaustively, so a wildcard `_` is necessary");
             } else if cx.is_foreign_non_exhaustive_enum(ty) {
                 err.note(format!("`{ty}` is marked as non-exhaustive, so a wildcard `_` is necessary to match exhaustively"));
-            } else if cx.is_uninhabited(ty.inner()) && cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns {
+            } else if cx.is_uninhabited(ty.inner()) {
                 // The type is uninhabited yet there is a witness: we must be in the `MaybeInvalid`
                 // case.
                 err.note(format!("`{ty}` is uninhabited but is not being matched by value, so a wildcard `_` is required"));

compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/lib.rs

@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ pub trait PatCx: Sized + fmt::Debug {
     type PatData: Clone;
 
     fn is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool;
-    fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool;
 
     /// The number of fields for this constructor.
     fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize;

compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/rustc.rs

@@ -237,9 +237,7 @@ fn reveal_and_alloc<'a, 'tcx>(
                         let tys = cx.variant_sub_tys(ty, variant).map(|(field, ty)| {
                             let is_visible =
                                 adt.is_enum() || field.vis.is_accessible_from(cx.module, cx.tcx);
-                            let is_uninhabited = (cx.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
-                                || cx.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns)
-                                && cx.is_uninhabited(*ty);
+                            let is_uninhabited = cx.is_uninhabited(*ty);
                             let skip = is_uninhabited && (!is_visible || is_non_exhaustive);
                             (ty, PrivateUninhabitedField(skip))
                         });
@@ -925,9 +923,6 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> PatCx for RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> {
     fn is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
         self.tcx.features().exhaustive_patterns
     }
-    fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
-        self.tcx.features().min_exhaustive_patterns
-    }
 
     fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &crate::constructor::Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize {
         self.ctor_arity(ctor, *ty)

compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs

@@ -543,13 +543,11 @@
 //! recurse into subpatterns. That second part is done through [`PlaceValidity`], most notably
 //! [`PlaceValidity::specialize`].
 //!
-//! Having said all that, in practice we don't fully follow what's been presented in this section.
-//! Let's call "toplevel exception" the case where the match scrutinee itself has type `!` or
-//! `EmptyEnum`. First, on stable rust, we require `_` patterns for empty types in all cases apart
-//! from the toplevel exception. The `exhaustive_patterns` and `min_exaustive_patterns` allow
-//! omitting patterns in the cases described above. There's a final detail: in the toplevel
-//! exception or with the `exhaustive_patterns` feature, we ignore place validity when checking
-//! whether a pattern is required for exhaustiveness. I (Nadrieril) hope to deprecate this behavior.
+//! Having said all that, we don't fully follow what's been presented in this section. For
+//! backwards-compatibility, we ignore place validity when checking whether a pattern is required
+//! for exhaustiveness in two cases: when the `exhaustive_patterns` feature gate is on, or when the
+//! match scrutinee itself has type `!` or `EmptyEnum`. I (Nadrieril) hope to deprecate this
+//! exception.
 //!
 //!
 //!
@@ -953,13 +951,10 @@ fn split_column_ctors<'a>(
             self.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors);
         // Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if
         // it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`).
-        let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid()
-            && (is_toplevel_exception
-                || cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()
-                || cx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on());
+        let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid();
         // Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the
         // toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility.
-        let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable
+        let can_omit_empty_arms = self.validity.is_known_valid()
             || is_toplevel_exception
             || cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on();
 

compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/tests/common/mod.rs

@@ -152,10 +152,6 @@ fn is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
         false
     }
 
-    fn is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on(&self) -> bool {
-        true
-    }
-
     fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Self>, ty: &Self::Ty) -> usize {
         ty.sub_tys(ctor).len()
     }

library/alloc/src/collections/vec_deque/into_iter.rs

@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ fn fold<B, F>(mut self, init: B, mut f: F) -> B
     {
         match self.try_fold(init, |b, item| Ok::<B, !>(f(b, item))) {
             Ok(b) => b,
+            #[cfg(bootstrap)]
             Err(e) => match e {},
         }
     }
@@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ fn rfold<B, F>(mut self, init: B, mut f: F) -> B
     {
         match self.try_rfold(init, |b, item| Ok::<B, !>(f(b, item))) {
             Ok(b) => b,
+            #[cfg(bootstrap)]
             Err(e) => match e {},
         }
     }

tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/empty-types.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 //@ revisions: normal min_exh_pats exhaustive_patterns never_pats
-// gate-test-min_exhaustive_patterns
 //
 // This tests correct handling of empty types in exhaustiveness checking.
 //