tcx.is_const_fn doesn't work the way it is described, remove it
Then we can rename the _raw functions to drop their suffix, and instead explicitly use is_stable_const_fn for the few cases where that is really what you want.
This commit is contained in:
parent
eb6026a27f
commit
cd2159434b
@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ fn check_terminator<'tcx>(
|
||||
| TerminatorKind::TailCall { func, args, fn_span: _ } => {
|
||||
let fn_ty = func.ty(body, tcx);
|
||||
if let ty::FnDef(fn_def_id, _) = *fn_ty.kind() {
|
||||
if !is_const_fn(tcx, fn_def_id, msrv) {
|
||||
if !is_stable_const_fn(tcx, fn_def_id, msrv) {
|
||||
return Err((
|
||||
span,
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
@ -377,12 +377,12 @@ fn check_terminator<'tcx>(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn is_const_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId, msrv: &Msrv) -> bool {
|
||||
fn is_stable_const_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId, msrv: &Msrv) -> bool {
|
||||
tcx.is_const_fn(def_id)
|
||||
&& tcx.lookup_const_stability(def_id).map_or(true, |const_stab| {
|
||||
&& tcx.lookup_const_stability(def_id).is_none_or(|const_stab| {
|
||||
if let rustc_attr::StabilityLevel::Stable { since, .. } = const_stab.level {
|
||||
// Checking MSRV is manually necessary because `rustc` has no such concept. This entire
|
||||
// function could be removed if `rustc` provided a MSRV-aware version of `is_const_fn`.
|
||||
// function could be removed if `rustc` provided a MSRV-aware version of `is_stable_const_fn`.
|
||||
// as a part of an unimplemented MSRV check https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65262.
|
||||
|
||||
let const_stab_rust_version = match since {
|
||||
@ -393,8 +393,12 @@ fn is_const_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId, msrv: &Msrv) -> bool {
|
||||
|
||||
msrv.meets(const_stab_rust_version)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Unstable const fn with the feature enabled.
|
||||
msrv.current().is_none()
|
||||
// Unstable const fn, check if the feature is enabled. We need both the regular stability
|
||||
// feature and (if set) the const stability feature to const-call this function.
|
||||
let stab = tcx.lookup_stability(def_id);
|
||||
let is_enabled = stab.is_some_and(|s| s.is_stable() || tcx.features().enabled(s.feature))
|
||||
&& const_stab.feature.is_none_or(|f| tcx.features().enabled(f));
|
||||
is_enabled && msrv.current().is_none()
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -346,13 +346,13 @@ fn visit_expr(&mut self, e: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
|
||||
.cx
|
||||
.qpath_res(p, hir_id)
|
||||
.opt_def_id()
|
||||
.map_or(false, |id| self.cx.tcx.is_const_fn_raw(id)) => {},
|
||||
.map_or(false, |id| self.cx.tcx.is_const_fn(id)) => {},
|
||||
ExprKind::MethodCall(..)
|
||||
if self
|
||||
.cx
|
||||
.typeck_results()
|
||||
.type_dependent_def_id(e.hir_id)
|
||||
.map_or(false, |id| self.cx.tcx.is_const_fn_raw(id)) => {},
|
||||
.map_or(false, |id| self.cx.tcx.is_const_fn(id)) => {},
|
||||
ExprKind::Binary(_, lhs, rhs)
|
||||
if self.cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(lhs).peel_refs().is_primitive_ty()
|
||||
&& self.cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(rhs).peel_refs().is_primitive_ty() => {},
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user