make treatment of unchecked/unsafe blocks more uniform
also repair various errors in the parser related to such blocks. rename checked_blk to default_blk to reflect the fact that it inherits its purity from the surrounding context.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9569371f7
commit
cbe8da0655
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ fn mk_tests(cx: test_ctxt) -> @ast::item {
|
||||
let test_descs = mk_test_desc_vec(cx);
|
||||
|
||||
let body_: ast::blk_ =
|
||||
checked_block([], option::some(test_descs), cx.next_node_id());
|
||||
default_block([], option::some(test_descs), cx.next_node_id());
|
||||
let body = nospan(body_);
|
||||
|
||||
let fn_ = {decl: decl, proto: proto, body: body};
|
||||
@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ fn mk_main(cx: test_ctxt) -> @ast::item {
|
||||
let test_main_call_expr = mk_test_main_call(cx);
|
||||
|
||||
let body_: ast::blk_ =
|
||||
checked_block([], option::some(test_main_call_expr),
|
||||
default_block([], option::some(test_main_call_expr),
|
||||
cx.next_node_id());
|
||||
let body = {node: body_, span: dummy_sp()};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2090,13 +2090,7 @@ fn check_expr_with_unifier(fcx: @fn_ctxt, expr: @ast::expr, unify: unifier,
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast::expr_block(b) {
|
||||
// If this is an unchecked block, turn off purity-checking
|
||||
let fcx_for_block =
|
||||
alt b.node.rules {
|
||||
ast::unchecked_blk. { @{purity: ast::impure_fn with *fcx} }
|
||||
ast::unsafe_blk. { @{purity: ast::unsafe_fn with *fcx} }
|
||||
ast::checked_blk. { fcx }
|
||||
};
|
||||
bot = check_block(fcx_for_block, b);
|
||||
bot = check_block(fcx, b);
|
||||
let typ =
|
||||
alt b.node.expr {
|
||||
some(expr) { expr_ty(tcx, expr) }
|
||||
@ -2553,7 +2547,12 @@ fn check_stmt(fcx: @fn_ctxt, stmt: @ast::stmt) -> bool {
|
||||
ret bot;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn check_block(fcx: @fn_ctxt, blk: ast::blk) -> bool {
|
||||
fn check_block(fcx0: @fn_ctxt, blk: ast::blk) -> bool {
|
||||
let fcx = alt blk.node.rules {
|
||||
ast::unchecked_blk. { @{purity: ast::impure_fn with *fcx0} }
|
||||
ast::unsafe_blk. { @{purity: ast::unsafe_fn with *fcx0} }
|
||||
ast::default_blk. { fcx0 }
|
||||
};
|
||||
let bot = false;
|
||||
let warned = false;
|
||||
for s: @ast::stmt in blk.node.stmts {
|
||||
|
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ type field_ = {mut: mutability, ident: ident, expr: @expr};
|
||||
|
||||
type field = spanned<field_>;
|
||||
|
||||
tag blk_check_mode { checked_blk; unchecked_blk; unsafe_blk; }
|
||||
tag blk_check_mode { default_blk; unchecked_blk; unsafe_blk; }
|
||||
|
||||
tag expr_check_mode { claimed_expr; checked_expr; }
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -185,13 +185,13 @@ fn eq_ty(&&a: @ty, &&b: @ty) -> bool { ret std::box::ptr_eq(a, b); }
|
||||
fn hash_ty(&&t: @ty) -> uint { ret t.span.lo << 16u + t.span.hi; }
|
||||
|
||||
fn block_from_expr(e: @expr) -> blk {
|
||||
let blk_ = checked_block([], option::some::<@expr>(e), e.id);
|
||||
let blk_ = default_block([], option::some::<@expr>(e), e.id);
|
||||
ret {node: blk_, span: e.span};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn checked_block(stmts1: [@stmt], expr1: option::t<@expr>, id1: node_id) ->
|
||||
fn default_block(stmts1: [@stmt], expr1: option::t<@expr>, id1: node_id) ->
|
||||
blk_ {
|
||||
ret {stmts: stmts1, expr: expr1, id: id1, rules: checked_blk};
|
||||
ret {stmts: stmts1, expr: expr1, id: id1, rules: default_blk};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn obj_field_from_anon_obj_field(f: anon_obj_field) -> obj_field {
|
||||
|
@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ fn parse_bottom_expr(p: parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
||||
p.peek() == token::OROR {
|
||||
ret parse_fn_block_expr(p);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let blk = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked_blk);
|
||||
let blk = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::default_blk);
|
||||
ret mk_expr(p, blk.span.lo, blk.span.hi, ast::expr_block(blk));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if eat_word(p, "if") {
|
||||
@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ fn parse_bottom_expr(p: parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
||||
} else if p.peek() == token::POUND_LBRACE {
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
let blk = ast::mac_embed_block(
|
||||
parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked_blk));
|
||||
parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::default_blk));
|
||||
ret mk_mac_expr(p, lo, p.get_hi_pos(), blk);
|
||||
} else if p.peek() == token::ELLIPSIS {
|
||||
p.bump();
|
||||
@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ fn parse_fn_expr(p: parser, proto: ast::proto) -> @ast::expr {
|
||||
fn parse_fn_block_expr(p: parser) -> @ast::expr {
|
||||
let lo = p.get_last_lo_pos();
|
||||
let decl = parse_fn_block_decl(p);
|
||||
let body = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked_blk);
|
||||
let body = parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::default_blk);
|
||||
let _fn = {decl: decl, proto: ast::proto_block, body: body};
|
||||
ret mk_expr(p, lo, body.span.hi, ast::expr_fn(_fn));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1684,12 +1684,14 @@ fn stmt_ends_with_semi(stmt: ast::stmt) -> bool {
|
||||
fn parse_block(p: parser) -> ast::blk {
|
||||
let lo = p.get_lo_pos();
|
||||
if eat_word(p, "unchecked") {
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::unchecked_blk);
|
||||
} else if eat_word(p, "unsafe") {
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::unsafe_blk);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expect(p, token::LBRACE);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::checked_blk);
|
||||
be parse_block_tail(p, lo, ast::default_blk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ fn print_possibly_embedded_block(s: ps, blk: ast::blk, embedded: embed_type,
|
||||
alt blk.node.rules {
|
||||
ast::unchecked_blk. { word(s.s, "unchecked"); }
|
||||
ast::unsafe_blk. { word(s.s, "unsafe"); }
|
||||
ast::checked_blk. { }
|
||||
ast::default_blk. { }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
maybe_print_comment(s, blk.span.lo);
|
||||
|
@ -4,8 +4,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
unsafe fn f() { ret; }
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
fn g() {
|
||||
unsafe {
|
||||
f();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn h() unsafe {
|
||||
f();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user