Rollup merge of #121977 - Lee-Janggun:master, r=WaffleLapkin
Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.
This commit is contained in:
commit
c83ca5ba9a
@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ pub fn fetch_not(&self, order: Ordering) -> bool {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a mutable pointer to the underlying [`bool`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting integer can be a data race.
|
||||
/// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting boolean can be a data race.
|
||||
/// This method is mostly useful for FFI, where the function signature may use
|
||||
/// `*mut bool` instead of `&AtomicBool`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ pub fn fetch_xor(&self, val: usize, order: Ordering) -> *mut T {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a mutable pointer to the underlying pointer.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting integer can be a data race.
|
||||
/// Doing non-atomic reads and writes on the resulting pointer can be a data race.
|
||||
/// This method is mostly useful for FFI, where the function signature may use
|
||||
/// `*mut *mut T` instead of `&AtomicPtr<T>`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user