From c836c24994f0113effd0409d8d063b4f4e68f5b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Stone Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:20:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Remove the ThinLTO CU hack This reverts #46722, commit e0ab5d5feb4eb2d8af11b8dd9446c2b45fada8af. Since #111167, commit 10b69dde3fd15334ea2382d2dc9e9a261de1afaf, we are generating DWARF subprograms in a way that is meant to be more compatible with LLVM's expectations, so hopefully we don't need this workaround rewriting CUs anymore. --- compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs | 49 ---------------- compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs | 6 -- .../rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp | 57 ------------------- 3 files changed, 112 deletions(-) diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs index d2e01708a37..604f68eb6a4 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/back/lto.rs @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ use std::io; use std::iter; use std::path::Path; -use std::ptr; use std::slice; use std::sync::Arc; @@ -709,17 +708,6 @@ pub unsafe fn optimize_thin_module( let llmod = module.module_llvm.llmod(); save_temp_bitcode(cgcx, &module, "thin-lto-input"); - // Before we do much else find the "main" `DICompileUnit` that we'll be - // using below. If we find more than one though then rustc has changed - // in a way we're not ready for, so generate an ICE by returning - // an error. - let mut cu1 = ptr::null_mut(); - let mut cu2 = ptr::null_mut(); - llvm::LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(llmod, &mut cu1, &mut cu2); - if !cu2.is_null() { - return Err(write::llvm_err(&diag_handler, LlvmError::MultipleSourceDiCompileUnit)); - } - // Up next comes the per-module local analyses that we do for Thin LTO. // Each of these functions is basically copied from the LLVM // implementation and then tailored to suit this implementation. Ideally @@ -766,43 +754,6 @@ pub unsafe fn optimize_thin_module( save_temp_bitcode(cgcx, &module, "thin-lto-after-import"); } - // Ok now this is a bit unfortunate. This is also something you won't - // find upstream in LLVM's ThinLTO passes! This is a hack for now to - // work around bugs in LLVM. - // - // First discovered in #45511 it was found that as part of ThinLTO - // importing passes LLVM will import `DICompileUnit` metadata - // information across modules. This means that we'll be working with one - // LLVM module that has multiple `DICompileUnit` instances in it (a - // bunch of `llvm.dbg.cu` members). Unfortunately there's a number of - // bugs in LLVM's backend which generates invalid DWARF in a situation - // like this: - // - // https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35212 - // https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35562 - // - // While the first bug there is fixed the second ended up causing #46346 - // which was basically a resurgence of #45511 after LLVM's bug 35212 was - // fixed. - // - // This function below is a huge hack around this problem. The function - // below is defined in `PassWrapper.cpp` and will basically "merge" - // all `DICompileUnit` instances in a module. Basically it'll take all - // the objects, rewrite all pointers of `DISubprogram` to point to the - // first `DICompileUnit`, and then delete all the other units. - // - // This is probably mangling to the debug info slightly (but hopefully - // not too much) but for now at least gets LLVM to emit valid DWARF (or - // so it appears). Hopefully we can remove this once upstream bugs are - // fixed in LLVM. - { - let _timer = cgcx - .prof - .generic_activity_with_arg("LLVM_thin_lto_patch_debuginfo", thin_module.name()); - llvm::LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(llmod, cu1); - save_temp_bitcode(cgcx, &module, "thin-lto-after-patch"); - } - // Alright now that we've done everything related to the ThinLTO // analysis it's time to run some optimizations! Here we use the same // `run_pass_manager` as the "fat" LTO above except that we tell it to diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs index 61365e6dc4b..d5be678c1bb 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs @@ -2480,12 +2480,6 @@ pub fn LLVMRustGetBitcodeSliceFromObjectData( len: usize, out_len: &mut usize, ) -> *const u8; - pub fn LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit( - M: &Module, - CU1: &mut *mut c_void, - CU2: &mut *mut c_void, - ); - pub fn LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(M: &Module, CU: *mut c_void); pub fn LLVMRustLinkerNew(M: &Module) -> &mut Linker<'_>; pub fn LLVMRustLinkerAdd( diff --git a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp index 5ec3b95225d..fc28f6efa44 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp +++ b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp @@ -1460,63 +1460,6 @@ LLVMRustGetBitcodeSliceFromObjectData(const char *data, return BitcodeOrError->getBufferStart(); } -// Rewrite all `DICompileUnit` pointers to the `DICompileUnit` specified. See -// the comment in `back/lto.rs` for why this exists. -extern "C" void -LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod, - DICompileUnit **A, - DICompileUnit **B) { - Module *M = unwrap(Mod); - DICompileUnit **Cur = A; - DICompileUnit **Next = B; - for (DICompileUnit *CU : M->debug_compile_units()) { - *Cur = CU; - Cur = Next; - Next = nullptr; - if (Cur == nullptr) - break; - } -} - -// Rewrite all `DICompileUnit` pointers to the `DICompileUnit` specified. See -// the comment in `back/lto.rs` for why this exists. -extern "C" void -LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod, DICompileUnit *Unit) { - Module *M = unwrap(Mod); - - // If the original source module didn't have a `DICompileUnit` then try to - // merge all the existing compile units. If there aren't actually any though - // then there's not much for us to do so return. - if (Unit == nullptr) { - for (DICompileUnit *CU : M->debug_compile_units()) { - Unit = CU; - break; - } - if (Unit == nullptr) - return; - } - - // Use LLVM's built-in `DebugInfoFinder` to find a bunch of debuginfo and - // process it recursively. Note that we used to specifically iterate over - // instructions to ensure we feed everything into it, but `processModule` - // started doing this the same way in LLVM 7 (commit d769eb36ab2b8). - DebugInfoFinder Finder; - Finder.processModule(*M); - - // After we've found all our debuginfo, rewrite all subprograms to point to - // the same `DICompileUnit`. - for (auto &F : Finder.subprograms()) { - F->replaceUnit(Unit); - } - - // Erase any other references to other `DICompileUnit` instances, the verifier - // will later ensure that we don't actually have any other stale references to - // worry about. - auto *MD = M->getNamedMetadata("llvm.dbg.cu"); - MD->clearOperands(); - MD->addOperand(Unit); -} - // Computes the LTO cache key for the provided 'ModId' in the given 'Data', // storing the result in 'KeyOut'. // Currently, this cache key is a SHA-1 hash of anything that could affect