diff --git a/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt b/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt
index 9d3c08ec832..9d44b61d5e1 100644
--- a/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt
+++ b/src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ run-make/llvm-ident/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines-cmd-exe/Makefile
 run-make/long-linker-command-lines/Makefile
 run-make/longjmp-across-rust/Makefile
-run-make/lto-dylib-dep/Makefile
 run-make/lto-linkage-used-attr/Makefile
 run-make/lto-no-link-whole-rlib/Makefile
 run-make/lto-smoke-c/Makefile
diff --git a/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/Makefile b/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/Makefile
deleted file mode 100644
index a9344597d08..00000000000
--- a/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/Makefile
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-# ignore-cross-compile
-include ../tools.mk
-
-# Test that we don't run into an assertion when using a Rust dylib dependency
-# while compiling with full LTO.
-# See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59137
-
-all:
-	$(RUSTC) a_dylib.rs --crate-type=dylib -C prefer-dynamic
-	$(RUSTC) main.rs -C lto
-	$(call RUN,main)
diff --git a/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/rmake.rs b/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/rmake.rs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..842fce467d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/run-make/lto-dylib-dep/rmake.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Compiling with link-time-optimizations (LTO) would previously run into an internal
+// compiler error (ICE) if a dylib was passed as a required library. This was due to a
+// misplaced assert! call in the compiler, which is now removed. This test checks that
+// this bug does not make a resurgence and that dylib+lto compilation succeeds.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59137
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+
+use run_make_support::{run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().input("a_dylib.rs").crate_type("dylib").arg("-Cprefer-dynamic").run();
+    rustc().input("main.rs").arg("-Clto").run();
+    run("main");
+}