Fix handling slices of empty types

This commit is contained in:
Nadrieril 2023-10-05 00:58:14 +02:00
parent edf6a2d337
commit c1b29b338d
3 changed files with 82 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -859,6 +859,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Constructor<'tcx> {
}
/// Describes the set of all constructors for a type.
#[derive(Debug)]
pub(super) enum ConstructorSet {
/// The type has a single constructor, e.g. `&T` or a struct.
Single,
@ -903,6 +904,7 @@ pub(super) enum ConstructorSet {
/// - constructors in `present` and `missing` are split for the column; in other words, they are
/// either fully included in or disjoint from each constructor in the column. This avoids
/// non-trivial intersections like between `0..10` and `5..15`.
#[derive(Debug)]
struct SplitConstructorSet<'tcx> {
present: SmallVec<[Constructor<'tcx>; 1]>,
missing: Vec<Constructor<'tcx>>,
@ -911,8 +913,8 @@ struct SplitConstructorSet<'tcx> {
}
impl ConstructorSet {
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(cx), ret)]
pub(super) fn for_ty<'p, 'tcx>(cx: &MatchCheckCtxt<'p, 'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Self {
debug!("ConstructorSet::for_ty({:?})", ty);
let make_range =
|start, end| IntRange::from_range(cx.tcx, start, end, ty, RangeEnd::Included);
// This determines the set of all possible constructors for the type `ty`. For numbers,
@ -1036,6 +1038,7 @@ impl ConstructorSet {
/// This is the core logical operation of exhaustiveness checking. This analyzes a column a
/// constructors to 1/ determine which constructors of the type (if any) are missing; 2/ split
/// constructors to handle non-trivial intersections e.g. on ranges or slices.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, pcx, ctors), ret)]
fn split<'a, 'tcx>(
&self,
pcx: &PatCtxt<'_, '_, 'tcx>,
@ -1111,7 +1114,7 @@ impl ConstructorSet {
}
&ConstructorSet::Slice(array_len) => {
let seen_slices = seen.map(|c| c.as_slice().unwrap());
let base_slice = Slice { kind: VarLen(0, 0), array_len };
let base_slice = Slice::new(array_len, VarLen(0, 0));
for (seen, splitted_slice) in base_slice.split(seen_slices) {
let ctor = Slice(splitted_slice);
match seen {
@ -1121,12 +1124,22 @@ impl ConstructorSet {
}
}
ConstructorSet::SliceOfEmpty => {
// Behaves essentially like `Single`.
let slice = Slice(Slice::new(None, FixedLen(0)));
if seen.next().is_none() {
missing.push(slice);
} else {
present.push(slice);
// This one is tricky because even though there's only one possible value of this
// type (namely `[]`), slice patterns of all lengths are allowed, they're just
// unreachable if length != 0.
// We still gather the seen constructors in `present`, but the only slice that can
// go in `missing` is `[]`.
let seen_slices = seen.map(|c| c.as_slice().unwrap());
let base_slice = Slice::new(None, VarLen(0, 0));
for (seen, splitted_slice) in base_slice.split(seen_slices) {
let ctor = Slice(splitted_slice);
match seen {
Presence::Seen => present.push(ctor),
Presence::Unseen if splitted_slice.arity() == 0 => {
missing.push(Slice(Slice::new(None, FixedLen(0))))
}
Presence::Unseen => {}
}
}
}
ConstructorSet::Unlistable => {

View File

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
#![feature(never_type)]
#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)]
#![deny(unreachable_patterns)]
fn main() {}
fn foo(nevers: &[!]) {
match nevers {
&[] => (),
};
match nevers {
&[] => (),
&[_] => (), //~ ERROR unreachable pattern
&[_, _, ..] => (), //~ ERROR unreachable pattern
};
match nevers {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` not covered
&[_] => (), //~ ERROR unreachable pattern
};
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
error: unreachable pattern
--> $DIR/slice_of_empty.rs:14:9
|
LL | &[_] => (),
| ^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/slice_of_empty.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![deny(unreachable_patterns)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unreachable pattern
--> $DIR/slice_of_empty.rs:15:9
|
LL | &[_, _, ..] => (),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unreachable pattern
--> $DIR/slice_of_empty.rs:20:9
|
LL | &[_] => (),
| ^^^^
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` not covered
--> $DIR/slice_of_empty.rs:18:11
|
LL | match nevers {
| ^^^^^^ pattern `&[]` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `&[!]`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL | &[_] => (), &[] => todo!(),
| ++++++++++++++++
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`.