Fix small typos in std::rand documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c2df5cc3c
commit
bffd802a3f
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
|
||||
//! so the "quality" of `/dev/random` is not better than `/dev/urandom` in most cases.
|
||||
//! However, this means that `/dev/urandom` can yield somewhat predictable randomness
|
||||
//! if the entropy pool is very small, such as immediately after first booting.
|
||||
//! Linux 3,17 added `getrandom(2)` system call which solves the issue: it blocks if entropy
|
||||
//! Linux 3.17 added the `getrandom(2)` system call which solves the issue: it blocks if entropy
|
||||
//! pool is not initialized yet, but it does not block once initialized.
|
||||
//! `OsRng` tries to use `getrandom(2)` if available, and use `/dev/urandom` fallback if not.
|
||||
//! If an application does not have `getrandom` and likely to be run soon after first booting,
|
||||
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
|
||||
//! > Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The rather unintuitive answer is that you will have a 2/3 chance of winning if
|
||||
//! you switch and a 1/3 chance of winning of you don't, so it's better to switch.
|
||||
//! you switch and a 1/3 chance of winning if you don't, so it's better to switch.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! This program will simulate the game show and with large enough simulation steps
|
||||
//! it will indeed confirm that it is better to switch.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user