Auto merge of #120692 - Nadrieril:move-column-analysis-to-placeinfo, r=compiler-errors

pattern_analysis: Move constructor selection logic to `PlaceInfo`

This is a small refactor PR. There was a dense bit of constructor-related logic in `compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness`. I'm moving it out into a `PlaceInfo` method to make it easier to follow both separately. I also have plans that will complicate it further so it's good that it's somewhat encapsulated.

r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit is contained in:
bors 2024-02-20 04:57:15 +00:00
commit bcea3cb748

View File

@ -760,9 +760,6 @@ impl<'a, Cx: TypeCx> PlaceCtxt<'a, Cx> {
fn ctor_arity(&self, ctor: &Constructor<Cx>) -> usize {
self.cx.ctor_arity(ctor, self.ty)
}
fn ctors_for_ty(&self) -> Result<ConstructorSet<Cx>, Cx::Error> {
self.cx.ctors_for_ty(self.ty)
}
fn wild_from_ctor(&self, ctor: Constructor<Cx>) -> WitnessPat<Cx> {
WitnessPat::wild_from_ctor(self.cx, ctor, self.ty.clone())
}
@ -815,7 +812,8 @@ fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
}
}
/// Data about a place under investigation.
/// Data about a place under investigation. Its methods contain a lot of the logic used to analyze
/// the constructors in the matrix.
struct PlaceInfo<Cx: TypeCx> {
/// The type of the place.
ty: Cx::Ty,
@ -826,6 +824,8 @@ struct PlaceInfo<Cx: TypeCx> {
}
impl<Cx: TypeCx> PlaceInfo<Cx> {
/// Given a constructor for the current place, we return one `PlaceInfo` for each field of the
/// constructor.
fn specialize<'a>(
&'a self,
cx: &'a Cx,
@ -839,6 +839,77 @@ fn specialize<'a>(
is_scrutinee: false,
})
}
/// This analyzes a column of constructors corresponding to the current place. It returns a pair
/// `(split_ctors, missing_ctors)`.
///
/// `split_ctors` is a splitted list of constructors that cover the whole type. This will be
/// used to specialize the matrix.
///
/// `missing_ctors` is a list of the constructors not found in the column, for reporting
/// purposes.
fn split_column_ctors<'a>(
&self,
cx: &Cx,
ctors: impl Iterator<Item = &'a Constructor<Cx>> + Clone,
) -> Result<(SmallVec<[Constructor<Cx>; 1]>, Vec<Constructor<Cx>>), Cx::Error>
where
Cx: 'a,
{
let ctors_for_ty = cx.ctors_for_ty(&self.ty)?;
// We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently.
let is_toplevel_exception =
self.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors);
// Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if
// it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`).
let empty_arms_are_unreachable = self.validity.is_known_valid()
&& (is_toplevel_exception
|| cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()
|| cx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on());
// Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the
// toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility.
let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable
|| is_toplevel_exception
|| cx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on();
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors);
let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty();
// Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type, so
// we add `Missing` to represent the missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor
// Splitting" at the top of this file.
let mut split_ctors = split_set.present;
if !(split_set.missing.is_empty()
&& (split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() || empty_arms_are_unreachable))
{
split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing);
}
// Which empty constructors are considered missing. We ensure that
// `!missing_ctors.is_empty() => split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds
// except when `!self.validity.is_known_valid()`.
let mut missing_ctors = split_set.missing;
if !can_omit_empty_arms {
missing_ctors.append(&mut split_set.missing_empty);
}
// Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing". At the top
// level we prefer to list all constructors.
let report_individual_missing_ctors = self.is_scrutinee || !all_missing;
if !missing_ctors.is_empty() && !report_individual_missing_ctors {
// Report `_` as missing.
missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::Wildcard];
} else if missing_ctors.iter().any(|c| c.is_non_exhaustive()) {
// We need to report a `_` anyway, so listing other constructors would be redundant.
// `NonExhaustive` is displayed as `_` just like `Wildcard`, but it will be picked
// up by diagnostics to add a note about why `_` is required here.
missing_ctors = vec![Constructor::NonExhaustive];
}
Ok((split_ctors, missing_ctors))
}
}
impl<Cx: TypeCx> Clone for PlaceInfo<Cx> {
@ -1314,30 +1385,14 @@ fn apply_constructor(
pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>,
missing_ctors: &[Constructor<Cx>],
ctor: &Constructor<Cx>,
report_individual_missing_ctors: bool,
) {
if self.is_empty() {
return;
}
if matches!(ctor, Constructor::Missing) {
// We got the special `Missing` constructor that stands for the constructors not present
// in the match.
if missing_ctors.is_empty() {
// Nothing to report.
*self = Self::empty();
} else if !report_individual_missing_ctors {
// Report `_` as missing.
let pat = pcx.wild_from_ctor(Constructor::Wildcard);
self.push_pattern(pat);
} else if missing_ctors.iter().any(|c| c.is_non_exhaustive()) {
// We need to report a `_` anyway, so listing other constructors would be redundant.
// `NonExhaustive` is displayed as `_` just like `Wildcard`, but it will be picked
// up by diagnostics to add a note about why `_` is required here.
let pat = pcx.wild_from_ctor(Constructor::NonExhaustive);
self.push_pattern(pat);
} else {
// For each missing constructor `c`, we add a `c(_, _, _)` witness appropriately
// filled with wildcards.
// in the match. For each missing constructor `c`, we add a `c(_, _, _)` witness
// appropriately filled with wildcards.
let mut ret = Self::empty();
for ctor in missing_ctors {
let pat = pcx.wild_from_ctor(ctor.clone());
@ -1347,7 +1402,6 @@ fn apply_constructor(
ret.extend(wit_matrix);
}
*self = ret;
}
} else {
// Any other constructor we unspecialize as expected.
for witness in self.0.iter_mut() {
@ -1479,51 +1533,13 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: TypeCx>(
};
};
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
debug!("ty: {:?}", place.ty);
let ctors = matrix.heads().map(|p| p.ctor());
let (split_ctors, missing_ctors) = place.split_column_ctors(mcx.tycx, ctors)?;
let ty = &place.ty.clone(); // Clone it out so we can mutate `matrix` later.
let pcx = &PlaceCtxt { cx: mcx.tycx, ty };
debug!("ty: {:?}", pcx.ty);
let ctors_for_ty = pcx.ctors_for_ty()?;
// We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently.
let is_toplevel_exception =
place.is_scrutinee && matches!(ctors_for_ty, ConstructorSet::NoConstructors);
// Whether empty patterns are counted as useful or not. We only warn an empty arm unreachable if
// it is guaranteed unreachable by the opsem (i.e. if the place is `known_valid`).
let empty_arms_are_unreachable = place.validity.is_known_valid()
&& (is_toplevel_exception
|| mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on()
|| mcx.tycx.is_min_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on());
// Whether empty patterns can be omitted for exhaustiveness. We ignore place validity in the
// toplevel exception and `exhaustive_patterns` cases for backwards compatibility.
let can_omit_empty_arms = empty_arms_are_unreachable
|| is_toplevel_exception
|| mcx.tycx.is_exhaustive_patterns_feature_on();
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
let ctors = matrix.heads().map(|p| p.ctor());
let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors);
let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty();
// Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type.
// We need to iterate over a full set of constructors, so we add `Missing` to represent the
// missing ones. This is explained under "Constructor Splitting" at the top of this file.
let mut split_ctors = split_set.present;
if !(split_set.missing.is_empty()
&& (split_set.missing_empty.is_empty() || empty_arms_are_unreachable))
{
split_ctors.push(Constructor::Missing);
}
// Whether we should report "Enum::A and Enum::C are missing" or "_ is missing". At the top
// level we prefer to list all constructors.
let report_individual_missing_ctors = place.is_scrutinee || !all_missing;
// Which constructors are considered missing. We ensure that `!missing_ctors.is_empty() =>
// split_ctors.contains(Missing)`. The converse usually holds except when
// `!place_validity.is_known_valid()`.
let mut missing_ctors = split_set.missing;
if !can_omit_empty_arms {
missing_ctors.append(&mut split_set.missing_empty);
}
let mut ret = WitnessMatrix::empty();
for ctor in split_ctors {
// Dig into rows that match `ctor`.
@ -1538,7 +1554,7 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: TypeCx>(
})?;
// Transform witnesses for `spec_matrix` into witnesses for `matrix`.
witnesses.apply_constructor(pcx, &missing_ctors, &ctor, report_individual_missing_ctors);
witnesses.apply_constructor(pcx, &missing_ctors, &ctor);
// Accumulate the found witnesses.
ret.extend(witnesses);