From bbfb6e762b65bdb34fbafef540e5c32408f213d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Carol (Nichols || Goulding)" Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 10:39:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] `derive` explanation for PartialOrd should match that for Ord I think these just got out of sync, but both use a lexicographic ordering. Relevant commits in the history of these explanations: * 8b81f76 on 2015-06-30 * e22770b on 2016-02-09 --- src/libcore/cmp.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libcore/cmp.rs b/src/libcore/cmp.rs index cd0bbcd3356..75cd56b79f4 100644 --- a/src/libcore/cmp.rs +++ b/src/libcore/cmp.rs @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ impl PartialOrd for Ordering { /// total order. For example, for floating point numbers, `NaN < 0 == false` and `NaN >= 0 == /// false` (cf. IEEE 754-2008 section 5.11). /// -/// This trait can be used with `#[derive]`. When `derive`d, it will produce an ordering -/// based on the top-to-bottom declaration order of the struct's members. +/// This trait can be used with `#[derive]`. When `derive`d, it will produce a lexicographic +/// ordering based on the top-to-bottom declaration order of the struct's members. /// /// # Examples ///