Rollup merge of #89440 - chrismit3s:issue-84488-fix, r=steveklabnik
Clarify a sentence in the documentation of Vec (#84488) I literally changed a single word, but this should clear up the confusion of #84488. Can probably be `rollup`ed :) (My first PR, hope I'm doing this right) fixes #84488 r? `@steveklabnik`
This commit is contained in:
commit
b458ecf29d
@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
|
||||
/// scratch space that it may use however it wants. It will generally just do
|
||||
/// whatever is most efficient or otherwise easy to implement. Do not rely on
|
||||
/// removed data to be erased for security purposes. Even if you drop a `Vec`, its
|
||||
/// buffer may simply be reused by another `Vec`. Even if you zero a `Vec`'s memory
|
||||
/// buffer may simply be reused by another allocation. Even if you zero a `Vec`'s memory
|
||||
/// first, that might not actually happen because the optimizer does not consider
|
||||
/// this a side-effect that must be preserved. There is one case which we will
|
||||
/// not break, however: using `unsafe` code to write to the excess capacity,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user