compute required_consts before promotion, and add promoteds that may fail
This commit is contained in:
parent
7183fa09bb
commit
b2b617a88e
@ -333,6 +333,15 @@ fn mir_promoted(
|
||||
body.tainted_by_errors = Some(error_reported);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Collect `required_consts` *before* promotion, so if there are any consts being promoted
|
||||
// we still add them to the list in the outer MIR body.
|
||||
let mut required_consts = Vec::new();
|
||||
let mut required_consts_visitor = RequiredConstsVisitor::new(&mut required_consts);
|
||||
for (bb, bb_data) in traversal::reverse_postorder(&body) {
|
||||
required_consts_visitor.visit_basic_block_data(bb, bb_data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
body.required_consts = required_consts;
|
||||
|
||||
// What we need to run borrowck etc.
|
||||
let promote_pass = promote_consts::PromoteTemps::default();
|
||||
pm::run_passes(
|
||||
@ -342,14 +351,6 @@ fn mir_promoted(
|
||||
Some(MirPhase::Analysis(AnalysisPhase::Initial)),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Promotion generates new consts; we run this after promotion to ensure they are accounted for.
|
||||
let mut required_consts = Vec::new();
|
||||
let mut required_consts_visitor = RequiredConstsVisitor::new(&mut required_consts);
|
||||
for (bb, bb_data) in traversal::reverse_postorder(&body) {
|
||||
required_consts_visitor.visit_basic_block_data(bb, bb_data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
body.required_consts = required_consts;
|
||||
|
||||
let promoted = promote_pass.promoted_fragments.into_inner();
|
||||
(tcx.alloc_steal_mir(body), tcx.alloc_steal_promoted(promoted))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -688,7 +688,6 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(eddyb) remove the differences for promotability in `static`, `const`, `const fn`.
|
||||
fn validate_candidates(
|
||||
ccx: &ConstCx<'_, '_>,
|
||||
temps: &mut IndexSlice<Local, TempState>,
|
||||
@ -713,6 +712,10 @@ struct Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// If true, all nested temps are also kept in the
|
||||
/// source MIR, not moved to the promoted MIR.
|
||||
keep_original: bool,
|
||||
|
||||
/// If true, add the new const (the promoted) to the required_consts of the parent MIR.
|
||||
/// This is initially false and then set by the visitor when it encounters a `Call` terminator.
|
||||
add_to_required: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
@ -815,6 +818,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
TerminatorKind::Call {
|
||||
mut func, mut args, call_source: desugar, fn_span, ..
|
||||
} => {
|
||||
// This promoted involves a function call, so it may fail to evaluate.
|
||||
// Let's make sure it is added to `required_consts` so that that failure cannot get lost.
|
||||
self.add_to_required = true;
|
||||
|
||||
self.visit_operand(&mut func, loc);
|
||||
for arg in &mut args {
|
||||
self.visit_operand(&mut arg.node, loc);
|
||||
@ -849,7 +856,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
fn promote_candidate(mut self, candidate: Candidate, next_promoted_id: usize) -> Body<'tcx> {
|
||||
let def = self.source.source.def_id();
|
||||
let mut rvalue = {
|
||||
let (mut rvalue, promoted_op) = {
|
||||
let promoted = &mut self.promoted;
|
||||
let promoted_id = Promoted::new(next_promoted_id);
|
||||
let tcx = self.tcx;
|
||||
@ -859,11 +866,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let args = tcx.erase_regions(GenericArgs::identity_for_item(tcx, def));
|
||||
let uneval = mir::UnevaluatedConst { def, args, promoted: Some(promoted_id) };
|
||||
|
||||
Operand::Constant(Box::new(ConstOperand {
|
||||
span,
|
||||
user_ty: None,
|
||||
const_: Const::Unevaluated(uneval, ty),
|
||||
}))
|
||||
ConstOperand { span, user_ty: None, const_: Const::Unevaluated(uneval, ty) }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let blocks = self.source.basic_blocks.as_mut();
|
||||
@ -896,22 +899,26 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let promoted_ref = local_decls.push(promoted_ref);
|
||||
assert_eq!(self.temps.push(TempState::Unpromotable), promoted_ref);
|
||||
|
||||
let promoted_operand = promoted_operand(ref_ty, span);
|
||||
let promoted_ref_statement = Statement {
|
||||
source_info: statement.source_info,
|
||||
kind: StatementKind::Assign(Box::new((
|
||||
Place::from(promoted_ref),
|
||||
Rvalue::Use(promoted_operand(ref_ty, span)),
|
||||
Rvalue::Use(Operand::Constant(Box::new(promoted_operand))),
|
||||
))),
|
||||
};
|
||||
self.extra_statements.push((loc, promoted_ref_statement));
|
||||
|
||||
Rvalue::Ref(
|
||||
tcx.lifetimes.re_erased,
|
||||
*borrow_kind,
|
||||
Place {
|
||||
local: mem::replace(&mut place.local, promoted_ref),
|
||||
projection: List::empty(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
(
|
||||
Rvalue::Ref(
|
||||
tcx.lifetimes.re_erased,
|
||||
*borrow_kind,
|
||||
Place {
|
||||
local: mem::replace(&mut place.local, promoted_ref),
|
||||
projection: List::empty(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
),
|
||||
promoted_operand,
|
||||
)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -923,6 +930,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
let span = self.promoted.span;
|
||||
self.assign(RETURN_PLACE, rvalue, span);
|
||||
|
||||
// Now that we did promotion, we know whether we'll want to add this to `required_consts`.
|
||||
if self.add_to_required {
|
||||
self.source.required_consts.push(promoted_op);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.promoted
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -982,6 +995,11 @@ fn promote_candidates<'tcx>(
|
||||
None,
|
||||
body.tainted_by_errors,
|
||||
);
|
||||
// We keep `required_consts` of the new MIR body empty. All consts mentioned here have
|
||||
// already been added to the parent MIR's `required_consts` (that is computed before
|
||||
// promotion), and no matter where this promoted const ends up, our parent MIR must be
|
||||
// somewhere in the reachable dependency chain so we can rely on its required consts being
|
||||
// evaluated.
|
||||
promoted.phase = MirPhase::Analysis(AnalysisPhase::Initial);
|
||||
|
||||
let promoter = Promoter {
|
||||
@ -991,6 +1009,7 @@ fn promote_candidates<'tcx>(
|
||||
temps: &mut temps,
|
||||
extra_statements: &mut extra_statements,
|
||||
keep_original: false,
|
||||
add_to_required: false,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let mut promoted = promoter.promote_candidate(candidate, promotions.len());
|
||||
|
@ -28,10 +28,6 @@ static SOME_STRUCT: &SomeStruct = &SomeStruct {
|
||||
f: &id,
|
||||
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
|
||||
//~| ERROR mismatched types
|
||||
//~| ERROR mismatched types
|
||||
//~| ERROR mismatched types
|
||||
//~| ERROR implementation of `Fn` is not general enough
|
||||
//~| ERROR implementation of `Fn` is not general enough
|
||||
//~| ERROR implementation of `Fn` is not general enough
|
||||
//~| ERROR implementation of `Fn` is not general enough
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -34,45 +34,5 @@ LL | f: &id,
|
||||
= note: `fn(&Foo<'2>) -> &Foo<'2> {id::<&Foo<'2>>}` must implement `FnOnce<(&'a Foo<'1>,)>`, for any lifetime `'1`...
|
||||
= note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&Foo<'2>,)>`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0308]: mismatched types
|
||||
--> $DIR/rfc1623-2.rs:28:8
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | f: &id,
|
||||
| ^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: expected trait `for<'a, 'b> Fn(&'a Foo<'b>)`
|
||||
found trait `Fn(&Foo<'_>)`
|
||||
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0308]: mismatched types
|
||||
--> $DIR/rfc1623-2.rs:28:8
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | f: &id,
|
||||
| ^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: expected trait `for<'a, 'b> Fn(&'a Foo<'b>)`
|
||||
found trait `Fn(&Foo<'_>)`
|
||||
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
|
||||
|
||||
error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
||||
--> $DIR/rfc1623-2.rs:28:8
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | f: &id,
|
||||
| ^^^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: `fn(&'2 Foo<'_>) -> &'2 Foo<'_> {id::<&'2 Foo<'_>>}` must implement `FnOnce<(&'1 Foo<'b>,)>`, for any lifetime `'1`...
|
||||
= note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&'2 Foo<'_>,)>`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
|
||||
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
|
||||
|
||||
error: implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
||||
--> $DIR/rfc1623-2.rs:28:8
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | f: &id,
|
||||
| ^^^ implementation of `FnOnce` is not general enough
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: `fn(&Foo<'2>) -> &Foo<'2> {id::<&Foo<'2>>}` must implement `FnOnce<(&'a Foo<'1>,)>`, for any lifetime `'1`...
|
||||
= note: ...but it actually implements `FnOnce<(&Foo<'2>,)>`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
|
||||
= note: duplicate diagnostic emitted due to `-Z deduplicate-diagnostics=no`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 8 previous errors
|
||||
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user