remove questionable calls to commit_if_ok
This commit is contained in:
parent
0a5b998c57
commit
ae92334c0f
@ -285,13 +285,11 @@ pub fn sub<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> Infer
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.sub(a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Makes `a == b`; the expectation is set by the call to
|
||||
@ -302,13 +300,11 @@ pub fn eq<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferR
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
@ -317,13 +313,11 @@ pub fn lub<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> Infer
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.lub(a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
@ -332,13 +326,11 @@ pub fn glb<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> Infer
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
at.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.glb(a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ fn unify_canonical_vars(
|
||||
variables1: &OriginalQueryValues<'tcx>,
|
||||
variables2: impl Fn(BoundVar) -> GenericArg<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()> {
|
||||
self.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
let mut obligations = vec![];
|
||||
for (index, value1) in variables1.var_values.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let value2 = variables2(BoundVar::new(index));
|
||||
@ -655,7 +654,6 @@ fn unify_canonical_vars(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { value: (), obligations })
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ fn confirm_projection_candidate(
|
||||
&mut obligations,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
obligations.extend(self.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
obligations.extend(
|
||||
self.infcx
|
||||
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
|
||||
.sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, placeholder_trait_predicate, candidate)
|
||||
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| obligations)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)
|
||||
})?);
|
||||
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)?,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(compiler-errors): I don't think this is needed.
|
||||
if let ty::Alias(ty::Projection, alias_ty) = placeholder_self_ty.kind() {
|
||||
@ -532,13 +532,13 @@ fn confirm_object_candidate(
|
||||
&mut nested,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
nested.extend(self.infcx.commit_if_ok(|_| {
|
||||
nested.extend(
|
||||
self.infcx
|
||||
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
|
||||
.sup(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, obligation_trait_ref, upcast_trait_ref)
|
||||
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| obligations)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)
|
||||
})?);
|
||||
.map_err(|_| Unimplemented)?,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check supertraits hold. This is so that their associated type bounds
|
||||
// will be checked in the code below.
|
||||
|
@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ LL | |
|
||||
LL | | });
|
||||
| |______^ expected due to this
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: expected closure signature `fn(_, _) -> _`
|
||||
found closure signature `fn(u32, i32) -> _`
|
||||
= note: expected closure signature `fn(_, u32) -> _`
|
||||
found closure signature `fn(_, i32) -> _`
|
||||
note: required by a bound in `with_closure`
|
||||
--> $DIR/expect-infer-var-appearing-twice.rs:2:14
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user