add comment mentioning alternative approach
This commit is contained in:
parent
db067f4a3e
commit
ae859c3f7b
@ -397,6 +397,11 @@ fn phase_cargo_miri(mut args: env::Args) {
|
||||
setup(subcommand);
|
||||
|
||||
// Invoke actual cargo for the job, but with different flags.
|
||||
// We re-use `cargo test` and `cargo run`, which makes target and binary handling very easy but
|
||||
// requires some extra work to make the build check-only (see all the `--emit` hacks below).
|
||||
// <https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1540#issuecomment-693553191> describes an alternative
|
||||
// approach that uses `cargo check`, making that part easier but target and binary handling
|
||||
// harder.
|
||||
let miri_path = std::env::current_exe().expect("current executable path invalid");
|
||||
let cargo_cmd = match subcommand {
|
||||
MiriCommand::Test => "test",
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user