mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Change the category of manual_is_power_of_two to pedantic

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Asuna 2024-10-15 21:27:46 +02:00
parent f32862384e
commit ac81f176a8
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
clippy_lints/src/manual_is_power_of_two.rs
View File

@ -11,10 +11,12 @@ use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass;
declare_clippy_lint! { declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does /// ### What it does
/// Checks for expressions like `x.count_ones() == 1` or `x & (x - 1) == 0`, with x and unsigned integer, which are manual /// Checks for expressions like `x.count_ones() == 1` or `x & (x - 1) == 0`, with x and unsigned integer, which may be manual
/// reimplementations of `x.is_power_of_two()`. /// reimplementations of `x.is_power_of_two()`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad? /// ### Why is this bad?
/// Manual reimplementations of `is_power_of_two` increase code complexity for little benefit. /// Manual reimplementations of `is_power_of_two` increase code complexity for little benefit.
///
/// ### Example /// ### Example
/// ```no_run /// ```no_run
/// let a: u32 = 4; /// let a: u32 = 4;
@ -27,7 +29,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ``` /// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.82.0"] #[clippy::version = "1.82.0"]
pub MANUAL_IS_POWER_OF_TWO, pub MANUAL_IS_POWER_OF_TWO,
complexity, pedantic,
"manually reimplementing `is_power_of_two`" "manually reimplementing `is_power_of_two`"
} }