Addressed comments by @compiler-errors and @bjorn3
This commit is contained in:
parent
c9c6e22f4b
commit
a6dd658254
@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ mod sig {
|
||||
|
||||
// Convert the result having "2 * precision" significant-bits back to the one
|
||||
// having "precision" significant-bits. First, move the radix point from
|
||||
// position "2*precision - 1" to "precision - 1". The exponent need to be
|
||||
// poision "2*precision - 1" to "precision - 1". The exponent need to be
|
||||
// adjusted by "2*precision - 1" - "precision - 1" = "precision".
|
||||
*exp -= precision as ExpInt + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
|
||||
//! ss2 = explicit_slot 8 ; _4: (&&[u16],) size=8 align=8,8
|
||||
//! sig0 = (i64, i64, i64) system_v
|
||||
//! sig1 = (i64, i64, i64) system_v
|
||||
//! fn0 = collocated u0:6 sig1 ; Instance { def: Item(DefId(0/0:31 ~ example[8787]::{{impl}}[1]::call_mut[0])), substs: [ReErased, ReErased] }
|
||||
//! fn0 = colocated u0:6 sig1 ; Instance { def: Item(DefId(0/0:31 ~ example[8787]::{{impl}}[1]::call_mut[0])), substs: [ReErased, ReErased] }
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! block0(v0: i64, v1: i64, v2: i64):
|
||||
//! v3 = stack_addr.i64 ss0
|
||||
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ fn compute_components<'tcx>(
|
||||
// regionck more ways to prove that it holds. However,
|
||||
// regionck is not (at least currently) prepared to deal with
|
||||
// higher-ranked regions that may appear in the
|
||||
// trait-ref. Therefore, if we see any higher-rank regions,
|
||||
// trait-ref. Therefore, if we see any higher-ranked regions,
|
||||
// we simply fallback to the most restrictive rule, which
|
||||
// requires that `Pi: 'a` for all `i`.
|
||||
ty::Projection(ref data) => {
|
||||
|
@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> LeakCheck<'me, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// Update minimum universe of scc1.
|
||||
self.scc_universes[scc1] = scc1_universe;
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, `scc_placeholder[scc1]` stores the placeholder that
|
||||
// At this point, `scc_placeholders[scc1]` stores the placeholder that
|
||||
// `scc1` must be equal to, if any.
|
||||
if let Some(scc1_placeholder) = self.scc_placeholders[scc1] {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
|
@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ pub enum UndefinedBehaviorInfo<'tcx> {
|
||||
},
|
||||
/// Something was divided by 0 (x / 0).
|
||||
DivisionByZero,
|
||||
/// Something was "remaineded" by 0 (x % 0).
|
||||
/// Something was "remainded" by 0 (x % 0).
|
||||
RemainderByZero,
|
||||
/// Signed division overflowed (INT_MIN / -1).
|
||||
DivisionOverflow,
|
||||
|
@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// we lower the guard.
|
||||
let target_block = self.cfg.start_new_block();
|
||||
let mut schedule_drops = true;
|
||||
// We keep a stack of all of the bindings and type descriptions
|
||||
// We keep a stack of all of the bindings and type ascriptions
|
||||
// from the parent candidates that we visit, that also need to
|
||||
// be bound for each candidate.
|
||||
traverse_candidate(
|
||||
|
@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
};
|
||||
TerminatorKind::if_(self.tcx, Operand::Copy(place), true_bb, false_bb)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// The switch may be inexhaustible so we have a catch all block
|
||||
// The switch may be inexhaustive so we have a catch all block
|
||||
debug_assert_eq!(options.len() + 1, target_blocks.len());
|
||||
let otherwise_block = *target_blocks.last().unwrap();
|
||||
let switch_targets = SwitchTargets::new(
|
||||
|
@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> fmt::Debug for DeconstructedPat<'p, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Without `cx`, we can't know which field corresponds to which, so we can't
|
||||
// get the names of the fields. Instead we just display everything as a simple
|
||||
// get the names of the fields. Instead we just display everything as a tuple
|
||||
// struct, which should be good enough.
|
||||
write!(f, "(")?;
|
||||
for p in self.iter_fields() {
|
||||
|
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
|
||||
lhs = self.parse_assoc_op_ascribe(lhs, lhs_span)?;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
} else if op == AssocOp::DotDot || op == AssocOp::DotDotEq {
|
||||
// If we did not have to handle `x..`/`x..=`, it would be pretty easy to
|
||||
// If we didn't have to handle `x..`/`x..=`, it would be pretty easy to
|
||||
// generalise it to the Fixity::None code.
|
||||
lhs = self.parse_range_expr(prec, lhs, op, cur_op_span)?;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Annotator<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !self.tcx.features().staged_api {
|
||||
// Propagate instability. This can happen even for non-staged-api crates in case
|
||||
// Propagate unstability. This can happen even for non-staged-api crates in case
|
||||
// -Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked is set.
|
||||
if let Some(stab) = self.parent_stab {
|
||||
if inherit_deprecation.yes() && stab.level.is_unstable() {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user