mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update comment and make code clearer

Browse Source 
I'm still not sure why this hack works so seemingly well.
This commit is contained in:
Noah Lev 2022-01-06 15:06:35 -08:00
parent 591ec49df3
commit a5f09f74d6
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
src/librustdoc/passes/collect_intra_doc_links.rs
View File

@ -6,13 +6,12 @@
use rustc_data_structures::{fx::FxHashMap, stable_set::FxHashSet};
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_expand::base::SyntaxExtensionKind;
use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def::{
DefKind,
Namespace::{self, *},
PerNS,
};
use rustc_hir::def_id::{CrateNum, DefId};
use rustc_hir::def_id::{CrateNum, DefId, CRATE_DEF_ID};
use rustc_middle::ty::{DefIdTree, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug, ty};
use rustc_resolve::ParentScope;
@ -1736,9 +1735,9 @@ fn article(self) -> &'static str {
fn descr(self) -> &'static str {
match self {
Self::Namespace(n) => n.descr(),
// HACK(jynelson): by looking at the source I saw the DefId we pass
// for `expected.descr()` doesn't matter, since it's not a crate
Self::Kind(k) => k.descr(DefId::local(hir::def_id::DefIndex::from_usize(0))),
// HACK(jynelson): the source of `DefKind::descr` only uses the DefId for
// printing "module" vs "crate" so using the wrong ID is not a huge problem
Self::Kind(k) => k.descr(CRATE_DEF_ID.to_def_id()),
Self::Primitive => "builtin type",
}
}