Fix single-match-else in the presence of macros expressions expanding to blocks

This commit is contained in:
Oliver Schneider 2017-03-03 16:56:16 +01:00
parent a161d3f8f4
commit a33930f815
2 changed files with 16 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
use syntax::codemap::Span;
use utils::paths;
use utils::{match_type, snippet, span_note_and_lint, span_lint_and_then, in_external_macro, expr_block, walk_ptrs_ty,
is_expn_of};
is_expn_of, remove_blocks};
use utils::sugg::Sugg;
/// **What it does:** Checks for matches with a single arm where an `if let`
@ -179,11 +179,12 @@ fn check_single_match(cx: &LateContext, ex: &Expr, arms: &[Arm], expr: &Expr) {
if arms.len() == 2 &&
arms[0].pats.len() == 1 && arms[0].guard.is_none() &&
arms[1].pats.len() == 1 && arms[1].guard.is_none() {
let els = if is_unit_expr(&arms[1].body) {
let els = remove_blocks(&arms[1].body);
let els = if is_unit_expr(els) {
None
} else if let ExprBlock(_) = arms[1].body.node {
} else if let ExprBlock(_) = els.node {
// matches with blocks that contain statements are prettier as `if let + else`
Some(&*arms[1].body)
Some(els)
} else {
// allow match arms with just expressions
return;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
#![feature(plugin)]
#![plugin(clippy)]
#![warn(single_match_else)]
fn main() {
let n = match (42, 43) {
(42, n) => n,
_ => panic!("typeck error"),
};
assert_eq!(n, 43);
}