rt: Initialize Windows CRITICAL_SECTION with non-zero spin count
If a CRITICAL_SECTION is not initialized with a spin count, it will default to 0, even on multi-processor systems. MSDN suggests using 4000. On single-processor systems, the spin count parameter is ignored and the critical section's spin count defaults to 0. For Windows >= Vista, extra debug info is allocated for CRITICAL_SECTIONs but not released in a timely manner. Consider using InitializeCriticalSectionEx(CRITICAL_SECTION_NO_DEBUG_INFO).
This commit is contained in:
parent
159dfd7c3b
commit
9f49293232
@ -19,7 +19,18 @@ lock_and_signal::lock_and_signal()
|
||||
: _holding_thread(INVALID_THREAD)
|
||||
{
|
||||
_event = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL);
|
||||
InitializeCriticalSection(&_cs);
|
||||
|
||||
// If a CRITICAL_SECTION is not initialized with a spin count, it will
|
||||
// default to 0, even on multi-processor systems. MSDN suggests using
|
||||
// 4000. On single-processor systems, the spin count parameter is ignored
|
||||
// and the critical section's spin count defaults to 0.
|
||||
const DWORD SPIN_COUNT = 4000;
|
||||
CHECKED(!InitializeCriticalSectionAndSpinCount(&_cs, SPIN_COUNT));
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO? Consider checking GetProcAddress("InitializeCriticalSectionEx")
|
||||
// so Windows >= Vista we can use CRITICAL_SECTION_NO_DEBUG_INFO to avoid
|
||||
// allocating CRITICAL_SECTION debug info that is never released. See:
|
||||
// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/804848/critical-sections-leaking-memory-on-vista-win2008#889853
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user