llvm: Match new LLVM 128-bit integer alignment on sparc
LLVM continues to align more 128-bit integers to 128-bits in the data layout rather than relying on the high level language to do it. Update SPARC target files to match and add a backcompat replacement for current LLVMs. See llvm/llvm-project#106951 for details
This commit is contained in:
parent
a0d98ff0e5
commit
9caced7bad
@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ pub(crate) unsafe fn create_module<'ll>(
|
||||
target_data_layout =
|
||||
target_data_layout.replace("-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64", "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if sess.target.arch.starts_with("sparc") {
|
||||
// LLVM 20 updates the sparc layout to correctly align 128 bit integers to 128 bit.
|
||||
// See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106951
|
||||
target_data_layout = target_data_layout.replace("-i128:128", "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the data-layout values hardcoded remain the defaults.
|
||||
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
std: Some(true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
pointer_width: 64,
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
arch: "sparc64".into(),
|
||||
options: base,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
std: Some(true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
pointer_width: 64,
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
arch: "sparc64".into(),
|
||||
options: TargetOptions { endian: Endian::Big, mcount: "__mcount".into(), ..base },
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
std: Some(true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
pointer_width: 64,
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
arch: "sparc64".into(),
|
||||
options: base,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
std: Some(true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
pointer_width: 32,
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-f128:64-n32-S64".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-i128:128-f128:64-n32-S64".into(),
|
||||
arch: "sparc".into(),
|
||||
options: TargetOptions {
|
||||
cpu: "v9".into(),
|
||||
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
};
|
||||
Target {
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-f128:64-n32-S64".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-i128:128-f128:64-n32-S64".into(),
|
||||
llvm_target: "sparc-unknown-none-elf".into(),
|
||||
metadata: crate::spec::TargetMetadata {
|
||||
description: Some("Bare 32-bit SPARC V7+".into()),
|
||||
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ pub(crate) fn target() -> Target {
|
||||
std: Some(true),
|
||||
},
|
||||
pointer_width: 64,
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
data_layout: "E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128".into(),
|
||||
// Use "sparc64" instead of "sparcv9" here, since the former is already
|
||||
// used widely in the source base. If we ever needed ABI
|
||||
// differentiation from the sparc64, we could, but that would probably
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user