mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Defer Place ty implementation in Stable Mir to later PR

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kirby Linvill 2023-11-09 20:43:05 -07:00
parent 2e70d95cdb
commit 998aa383ba
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: E304CE3F028E6E3F
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
compiler/stable_mir/src/mir/body.rs
View File

@ -646,8 +646,10 @@ pub fn ty(&self) -> Ty {
} }
impl Place { impl Place {
// TODO(klinvill): What is the expected behavior of this function? Should it resolve down the // FIXME(klinvill): This function is expected to resolve down the chain of projections to get
// chain of projections so that `*(_1.f)` would end up returning the type referenced by `f`? // the type referenced at the end of it. E.g. calling `ty()` on `*(_1.f)` should end up
// returning the type referenced by `f`. The information needed to do this may not currently be
// present in Stable MIR since at least an implementation for AdtDef is probably needed.
pub fn ty(&self, locals: &[LocalDecl]) -> Ty { pub fn ty(&self, locals: &[LocalDecl]) -> Ty {
let _start_ty = locals[self.local].ty; let _start_ty = locals[self.local].ty;
todo!("Implement projection") todo!("Implement projection")